Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
June 29, 2023
Title: Their Way or the Highway
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Ethan Peck
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Kroger issued a statement: “Some people’s morality can be a
barrier to accepting LGBTQ+ people.”
Ethan Peck is an associate for the
Free
Enterprise Project, a program of the National Center for Public
Policy Research. Today, Ethan discusses how Kroger policy mandates are
placing employees with Conservative values at risk.
Click here to
read the FEP’s proposal to Kroger.
Click
here for further information.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is the Free Enterprise Project? How do the they monitor
corporations?
What tactics has the Left used for decades to influence shareholders and
corporations?
Is there ample evidence that Kroger employees with Conservative viewpoints may
face discrimination? Ethan Peck explains the FEP audit proposal.
Did Kroger recently kowtow to leftwing social media criticism by removing
patriotic and Second Amendment related items from store shelves? Ethan reminds
us of what Muslims did when they conquered a land, comparing this act to the
Left’s “cult of wokeness”.
What other corporations are on the FEP’s radar?
Click here to help support the
National Center for Public Policy Research.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 28, 2022
Title: Are the Disabled Being Left Behind?
Topic: Disability Employment Awareness
Discussed by Melissa Ortiz
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
1 in 4 adults in the US are living with a disability, including impairments with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognition.
This equates to 61 million people! At least 75% of the 61 million people could be working if they were given the proper accommodations and support.
Today, Melissa Ortiz discusses ways the government can actually help – not hinder – those living with a disability. Melissa recently joined the
NCPPR to help launch their newest initiative,
Able Americans.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Who is Annie Oakley? HINT: Not the famous markswoman who was known for her sharpshooting.
Do more Americans need service dogs/animals to help them navigate daily life? Melissa discusses a bill introduced in Congress which would give a service dog to every US Veteran who requested one at no cost.
What are some short-term disabilities? Do those with short-term disabilities need assistance until they are able to return to work?
Are some government programs barriers to improved quality of life?
How can we all help with the quality of life for someone with a disability? Melissa responds with this question: “How would you help someone without a disability improve their quality of life?”
Click here to help the National Center as they fight to improve the quality of life for all people.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 5, 2022
Title: The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
Dr. Bonner R. Cohen is a Senior Fellow at the National Center
for Public Policy Research, where he concentrates on energy, natural
resources, and international relations. Today he discusses the Democrat’s unattainable dream of electric vehicle (EV) utopia using the
Inflation Reduction Act.
Click here for more on this and other topics from Dr. Bonner Cohen.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is California really outlawing the sale of gasoline powered cars, trucks, and buses? Are they also forbidding all other uses of fossil fuels in engines? Dr. Cohen reveals that they hope to achieve this by the year 2035 and many states will follow suit, limiting American’s ability to purchase a vehicle of their choice.
Will manufactures eventually stop building gasoline powered vehicles?
Will electric cars drop in price? Dr. Cohen and others predict the cost will just keep getting higher and higher, which will be detrimental to middle and lower-income Americans.
What is the end goal for the environmentalists pushing EV’s?
Will hundreds of thousands of automobile workers lose their jobs? Dr. Cohen reveals that Ford just recently announced that they will be laying off 3,000 white-collar jobs in connection with its transition to EV’s.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Without tax subsidies, will middle and lower-income Americans be able to afford
an electric vehicle? Dr. Cohen believes that even with subsidies, they won’t be
able to afford one!
How long does the average EV battery last before it must be replaced? Are
efforts being made to lengthen the life of EV batteries? What is the average
cost for an EV battery?
What is the proper way to dispose of an EV battery? Is this actually harmful to
the environment? Dr. Cohen briefly explains that EV batteries are full of toxic
chemicals and there is no safe way to dispose of them without polluting the
ground.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What raw materials are needed to manufacture EV’s and their batteries? Where are
most of these raw materials mined? Will environmentalists allow the materials to
be mined in the US? If you don’t know the answers to these questions, your head
is going to explode!
If the raw materials for EV’s cannot come from Russia or China or even America
per environmentalists’ demands, where will they come from? Do these countries
even have the resources and raw materials needed?
Does California have enough electric generating capacity to charge everyone’s
electric vehicles?
Bottom Line: Do “they” want every American totally dependent on the
government?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 1, 2022
Title: The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
Dr. Bonner R. Cohen is a Senior Fellow at the National Center
for Public Policy Research, where he concentrates on energy, natural
resources, and international relations. Today he discusses the Democrat’s unattainable dream of electric vehicle (EV) utopia using the
Inflation Reduction Act.
Click here for more on this and other topics from Dr. Bonner Cohen.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is California really outlawing the sale of gasoline powered cars, trucks, and buses? Are they also forbidding all other uses of fossil fuels in engines? Dr. Cohen reveals that they hope to achieve this by the year 2035 and many states will follow suit, limiting American’s ability to purchase a vehicle of their choice.
Will manufactures eventually stop building gasoline powered vehicles?
Will electric cars drop in price? Dr. Cohen and others predict the cost will just keep getting higher and higher, which will be detrimental to middle and lower-income Americans.
What is the end goal for the environmentalists pushing EV’s?
Will hundreds of thousands of automobile workers lose their jobs? Dr. Cohen reveals that Ford just recently announced that they will be laying off 3,000 white-collar jobs in connection with its transition to EV’s.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Without tax subsidies, will middle and lower-income Americans be able to afford
an electric vehicle? Dr. Cohen believes that even with subsidies, they won’t be
able to afford one!
How long does the average EV battery last before it must be replaced? Are
efforts being made to lengthen the life of EV batteries? What is the average
cost for an EV battery?
What is the proper way to dispose of an EV battery? Is this actually harmful to
the environment? Dr. Cohen briefly explains that EV batteries are full of toxic
chemicals and there is no safe way to dispose of them without polluting the
ground.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - The Democrat’s Road to EV Utopia is about to Get a Whole Lot Bumpier
Topic: Democrats Gone Wild
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What raw materials are needed to manufacture EV’s and their batteries? Where are
most of these raw materials mined? Will environmentalists allow the materials to
be mined in the US? If you don’t know the answers to these questions, your head
is going to explode!
If the raw materials for EV’s cannot come from Russia or China or even America
per environmentalists’ demands, where will they come from? Do these countries
even have the resources and raw materials needed?
Does California have enough electric generating capacity to charge everyone’s
electric vehicles?
Bottom Line: Do “they” want every American totally dependent on the
government?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 12, 2022
Title: SCOTUS Left a Bitter Pill to Swallow in One of its Key Rulings
Topic: Climate Change Bologna
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Dr. Bonner Cohen recently wrote: “The Biden administration’s
plan to use the administrative regulatory state to further what the president
has called the 'incredible transition' to green energy hit a speed bump with the
Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling reining in the Environmental Agency’s (EPA)
authority to regulate power plants.” Today, Dr. Cohen, a
senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research,
discusses the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Click
here to read Dr. Cohen’s full op-ed on this topic.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Who within our government is authorized to decide major policy issues? Dr. Cohen
reminds us of the role of Congress, the division of powers, and the branches of
government. He further explains how many agencies, such as the EPA and CDC, have
become “lawmakers” over the past few decades and why it has been so bad
for many reasons.
What is the purpose is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)?
Did Obama state that he could use his “pen and phone” to achieve his
goal to phase out fossil fuels?
Bottom Line: Is CO2 a pollutant? No.
How did the Supreme Court come to their decision if none of them are scientists?
Dr. Cohen explains the West Virginia case in question, saying: “It was
scientifically absurd!”
What does the future hold for this issue? Where will Americans get affordable
and reliable energy? Dr. Cohen discusses why wind and solar energy and electric
cars are NOT the answer.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 12, 2022
Title: Disney Exposed
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Ethan Peck
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children.
Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
New guest, Ethan Peck, discusses some disturbing information about Disney today.
You might not want to believe that it is true – but it is!
Ethan is an associate for the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project. He
holds a Master’s Degree in Counter-Terrorism & Homeland Security from the Lauder
School of Government at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya, Israel. Ethan
is well-versed in woke ideology and the social justice mindset. He is hopeful
that traditional American values can be communicated effectively across the
aisle and is passionate about seeing that accomplished.
Click
here to read Ethan Peck’s opinion article on this topic.
Click here for more
about the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project.
Click here to sign up for FREE INSIDER
UPDATES from the National Center for Public Policy Research.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Ethan was raised in a home that feared and believed in God, but gravitated
toward Leftist ideals in college. What brough him back to the “right side”?
Has Disney been the world’s leading content creator for children for many, many
decades?
Was discussion about “adding queerness and gender nonconforming characters to
children’s programming” recently captured and exposed to the world through
leaked videos? Ethan reveals that Disney executives actually said on video they
have a “not-so-secret-gay-agenda”.
Do these videos further expose Disney executives openly celebrating their past
efforts to introduce gender and sex-based content to children?
Do other videos expose the short-term plans of Disney to have a minimum of 50%
of characters be LGBQIA?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Disney Exposed
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Ethan Peck
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children.
Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Are the woke intentions of the radical Left becoming more and more blatantly
clear? Ethan explains why he says: “It is a direct and complete inversion of
Christianity.”
The Left-dominated education bureaucracy has been effectively turning schools
into indoctrination camps for decades. Are they now coming after businesses?
SShould people sell their stock on Disney? Ethan says NO! But
why not? He has a great reason!
Let your voice be heard! Investor relations can be contacted at
ir@thewaltdisneycompany.com
or by phone at 1-855-553-4763.
Why is Ethan Peck so passionate about restoring traditional American values?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 4, 2022
Title: Joe’s “Stake Driven Through Our Union” Speech
Topic: Joe Biden
Discussed by Emery McClendon
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Project 21 member Emery McClendon believes that Joe Biden’s 2022
SOTU speech could more properly be called the “Stake Driven Through Our
Union” speech. Today, Emery offers his expert analysis of Joe’s speech.
Click here for more
on Emory McClendon.
Click here for more from the NCPPR on this and other
issues facing America.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why is Emery McClendon a Conservative? Listen to his fantastic answer!
Has the Democrat Party left behind traditional American values?
What difficulties are Americans facing today that they did not face while Trump
was President? Emery says: “We could go on and on, but first of all let me
mention the price of groceries and feeding a family…and the high price of fuel.”
He goes on to discuss several other issues such as the lack of good jobs, the
crisis at the border, and the destruction of our military.
Why should we not believe the sugarcoated words of Joe Biden and his
administration?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 5, 2021
Title: PROOF: The CDC Lied to Us
Topic: Coronavirus
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
A recent study by the Institute for Pure and Applied
Knowledge/Public Health Initiative raises intriguing questions. The study, “COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & the Law,” concludes that the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) unilaterally altered the 17-year-old process by which it calculated disease-caused fatalities, creating a special procedure for tabulating COVID-19 deaths.
Dr. Bonner Cohen, a Senior Fellow with the NCPPR, reveals the details – details most of us have known to be true for months.
Click
here for more information.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Did the nation reach a significant milestone in late February in regards to the number of reported COVID-19 deaths? Are the numbers accurate?
Is there proof that the CDC altered the process in order to fudge the case/death numbers for COVID-19?
Was this alteration just used for tabulating COVID-19 cases/deaths? Dr. Cohen explains that the CDC violated three Federal Statutes: The Data Quality Act, The Administrative Procedures Act, and the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting the cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - PROOF: The CDC Lied to Us
Topic: Coronavirus
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
For the past seventeen years, have coroners, medical examiners, and physicians
had a specific procedure for marking and categorizing a death/death certificate?
OOn its own accord, did the CDC alter these instructions in order to
de-emphasize underlying causes of death, also referred to as preexisting
conditions or comorbidities?
Will we ever know the exact number of people who died strictly from COVID-19?
Dr. Cohen states: “We don’t have accurate figures because the CDC
willfully distorted them…The CDC rigged the game from the very
beginning. We cannot go back and untangle the web that they have woven.”
How does this compare to the Tuskegee Experiment? Are we looking at a
major cover-up conspiracy?
Where do we go from here? Can we every trust the CDC again?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 11, 2021
Title: What’s Next for America?
Topic: America Divided
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
With only days remaining in his Presidency, many are again calling for President Trump’s removal from office. What happens next?
David Ridenour is the President of the National Center for Public Policy Research.
For more on this topic, click
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Will the Trump-haters go away once he is no longer President? Or will they hound him through all eternity?
Did President Trump egg on and encourage the law-breakers last Wednesday?
The Left completely ignored the violent riots and protest for seven months. Are they now saying the attack last Wednesday is terrorism, calling for the most severe punishment possible?
Is it customary for Cabinet Secretaries and other appointed officials to resign before the next President officially takes office?
Have President Trump’s policies helped more Americans than they have harmed?
Will a free America survive the next two years?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 11, 2020
Title: Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy
Topic: Climate Change Bologna
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
“Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy” is set for a global online release on Thursday, September 24.
Nationally syndicated columnist Cal Thomas states: “No film debunks the faith of the climate change cult better than [the soon to be release film] Climate Hustle 2. And it does it with facts!"
Dr. Bonner Cohen is a Senior Policy Analyst with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow and an internationally recognized expert on natural resources.
More information about “Climate Hustle 2” can be found
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Are we facing a nationwide referendum on our energy future?
Does Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy expose Hollywood’s hypocrisy?
Does the film expose financial corruption of the Left?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy
Topic: Climate Change Bologna
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy expose media
bias?
What is their end-game? Bottom line: Total control to micromanage every decision
people make – even our speech!
Click here
for more on the film: Climate Hustle 2: The Rise of the Climate Monarchy.
Make plans to watch this with your family on Thursday September 24. Tickets are
only $14.99 (not person – just one fee) and can be purchased at that above link.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 23, 2020
Title: FIRED for Political Beliefs
Topic: Discrimination Against Conservatives
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Does discrimination in the workforce against Conservatives really
exist? You bet it does!
Justin Danhof, General Counsel for the National Center for Public Policy
Research, discusses the newest political antics of Salesforce Reserve
head Marc Benioff, perhaps the most liberal CEO in America.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is “Viewpoint Discrimination”?
Who is ALPHABET? Did they recently end a years-long lawsuit for firing
a Conservative engineer?
What is Salesforce Reserve? Is the CEO, Mark Benioff, one of the “good
guys” or a “bad guy”?
Is Salesforce Reserve practicing viewpoint discrimination? What proof
does Justin have?
Have left-leaning organizations bullied corporations through share-holder
meetings for decades?
Is Conservative Viewpoint Discrimination rampant across corporate America?
Is Conservative Viewpoint Discrimination rampant in American colleges and
universities?
When asked if he would amend the EEO policy to explicitly protect against
discrimination based on viewpoint and ideology, what was Salesforce Reserve CEO
Mark Benioff’s response? NOTE: HIS RESPONSE WILL MAKE YOUR
BLOOD BOIL!!
Click
here for more on this issue from the NCPPR.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 3, 2019
Title: Is California on the Brink of Collapse?
Topic: California Crush
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
As frustration grows over widespread wildfires and power outages in California, longstanding environmental policies and the state’s management of its natural resources are coming under growing scrutiny as contributing to the ongoing devastation.
Dr. Bonner Cohen is a senior fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research, where he concentrates on energy, natural resources, and international relations. Dr. Cohen explains just what is going on in the land of the fruits and the nuts --- and how it is affecting the rest of the country.
To read Dr. Cohen’s article on this topic, click
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why has the state California been suffering from so many wildfires over the past few decades? Dr. Cohen discusses some of the causes, including nature, lightning strikes, careless campers, and electrical shorts…
Do bugs and trees have more rights in California than humans? “This is negligence on the part of the government of California on an absolutely massive – and I dare say criminal scale,” Dr. Cohen states matter-of-factly.
Has PG&E conducted brown-outs and black-outs, keeping millions of customers in the dark for long periods of time? Does this contribute to the wildfires?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - Is California on the Brink of Collapse?
Topic: California Crush
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
How have state and federal bureaucrats contributed to hazardous fire conditions
in California? Dr. Cohen discusses the ridiculous rules on tree trimming and
brush clearing…
Is PG&E a government-controlled monopoly?
Are government bureaucrats dictating how PG&E is to spend its revenue?
Is the government also dictating how to trim trees and maintain local
habitation? Why and how?
Are these insane policies directly affecting how firefighters are able to battle
the wildfires in California? “They are working under absolutely impossible
circumstances,” Dr. Cohen believes.
Dr. Cohen reveals how much money PG&E is being forced to spend over the
next few years and where that money is going…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - Is California on the Brink of Collapse?
Topic: California Crush
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is PG&E 100% at fault for the fires and power outages in California?
How long do many experts believe these conditions will last? Why does Dr. Cohen
believe they are being optimistic?
Why are many individuals, families, and businesses leaving California?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 27, 2019
Title: If Water Stands/Puddles On Your Property: EPA Regulates
Topic: EPA to Regulate Your Puddle and Ditch
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Under the Obama Administration, the EPA was granted the authority to regulate every single body of water in the US – even a puddle on your own private property. Yes! This is true!
Thankfully, all that has now changed, thanks to President Trump's repeal of this suffocating regulation!
Dr. Conner Bohen is Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research, where he concentrates on energy, natural resources, and international relations.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is it “really” true that the Obama Administration grated the EPA full access and governing rights to every single body of water in the US – even a puddle on private property?
Did many believe this was a gross overreach of power?
Why did the courts agree with the people, ruling against the Obama Administration regulation?
Did President Trump take positive action to reverse this regulation?
Should bureaucrats sitting in an obscure office in WDC have the dictatorial power to tell Texas land owners, developers, farmers, and ranchers what they can and cannot do with their property?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 17, 2019
Title: Putting Politics Ahead of Profits
Topic: Assaulting the Second Amendment
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Many Americans from all walks of life were disturbed when they learned of Levi Strauss’s opposition to the Second Amendment and its funding of anti-gun activism.
In a
recent op-ed, David Almasi, VP of the
National Center for Public Policy Research, revealed the results of a recent poll conducted on the issue. Today, he shares those results with us and predicts Levi’s profit future.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What did responders say about the company Levi Strauss before learning of their stance on the Second Amendment?
What did responders say about the company Levi Strauss after learning of their stance on the Second Amendment?
Why did the NCPPR attend the Levi Strauss shareholder meeting?
How long have Democrats been attending big-business shareholder meetings pushing their leftist/socialist agenda? Unchecked, they have been winning.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Putting Politics Ahead of Profits
Topic: Assaulting the Second Amendment
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Levi’s target market opposes their anti-Second Amendment stand and many, many
state they will no longer buy the Levi brand.
What has the MSM reported on this poll?
Despite proof that their politics could hurt sales in key demographics, did
leaders of Levi Strauss stand their ground?
Will this negative publicity damage Levi’s long-term profits?
Why has the NCPPR attended over 100 shareholder meetings over the last few
years?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 29, 2018
Title: Boycotts: Effective or Not?
Topic: Boycotts
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Are boycotts and/or threats of boycotts effective in changing corporate
policy or giving?
Justin Danhof is the General Counsel for the National Center for Public
Policy Research, as well as Director of the Center’s Free Enterprise
Project. Justin will be discussing the recent announcement by United
Airlines to break ties with the NRA and if boycotting businesses
for similar decisions are effective.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Are boycotts and/or threats of boycotts effective in changing corporate policy
and or giving?
How and why did United Airlines slap NRA supporters?
Why did Justin Danhoff confront the CEO of United Airlines? How did the
NRA backstabbing corporate leader of United Airlines respond?
What is corporate America’s response to the carnage that occurs week after week
in Chicago?
Should we boycott United Airlines? Justin answers with this amazing
comment: “Part of the free market is free will.” Yes! Exactly! #boycottUnitedAirlines
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 7, 2018
Title: Opinion Leaders Respond to Trump’s SOTU Address
Topic: Donald Trump
Discussed by Emery McClendon
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Emery McClendon
is with The National Center for Public Policy Research. Emery is a
member of The Center’s Project 21 National Advisory Council. Emery also
won Americans for Prosperity’s “Activist of the Year” award for his
work as a Tea Party Movement organizer.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What was Emery McClendon’s reaction when Donald Trump announced he was running
for President?
“The worst Republican is still better than the best Democrat.” Does Emery agree
with this statement?
What can we say to non-registered voters to convince them that the Left is just
flat wrong? Emery says this: “We have to show them that we are living in a
crossroads in America. America is about to be doomed.”
Are our children from K-college being brainwashed in public schools and
universities across the nation?
How can we reeducate the millennials? Listen as Emery urges us to start at home,
telling our children the truth about our history. He also says we must be
consistent…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 1, 2018
Title: Does Walgreens Support Sanctuary Cities?
Topic: Sanctuary Cities
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Pharmacy giant Walgreens is coming under fire for recent comments
made in support of sanctuary cities. However, now that the cat is
out of the bag, they are back-peddling – and fast.
Justin Danhoff is General Counsel and FEP Director at the National Center
for Public Policy Research. Listen in as he gives more details.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do most big corporations, like Walgreens or Starbucks, donate money only to
left-leaning charitable donations?
Is UnidosUS (formerly the National Council of La Raza) an organization
that believes in reuniting California, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Texas
with Mexico?
Do most Americans believe in open borders, allowing anyone a chance to live here
– no questions asked? Listen as Mark Tooley explains the law regarding this hot
topic…
Does Walgreens support the League of Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
which supports sanctuary cities and amnesty for illegal immigrants?
A 2017 Harvard-Harris poll found 80% of American voters oppose sanctuary city
policies. When presented with the facts, how did the executives with Walgreens
react? What did they promise to do?
Find more information on this issue here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 24, 2018
Title: Does Walgreens Support Sanctuary Cities?
Topic: Sanctuary Cities
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Pharmacy giant Walgreens is coming under fire for recent comments
made in support of sanctuary cities. However, now that the cat is
out of the bag, they are back-peddling – and fast.
Justin Danhoff is General Counsel and FEP Director at the National Center
for Public Policy Research. Listen in as he gives more details.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do most big corporations, like Walgreens or Starbucks, donate money only to
left-leaning charitable donations?
Is UnidosUS (formerly the National Council of La Raza) an organization
that believes in reuniting California, Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Texas
with Mexico?
Do most Americans believe in open borders, allowing anyone a chance to live here
– no questions asked? Listen as Mark Tooley explains the law regarding this hot
topic…
Does Walgreens support the League of Latin American Citizens (LULAC)
which supports sanctuary cities and amnesty for illegal immigrants?
A 2017 Harvard-Harris poll found 80% of American voters oppose sanctuary city
policies. When presented with the facts, how did the executives with Walgreens
react? What did they promise to do?
Find more information on this issue here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 11, 2017
Title: Al Gore is an Energy Hog
Topic: Environmental Issues
Discussed by Drew Johnson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Is Al Gore an Energy Hog? NOTE: The information in this segment is regarding only ONE of Al Gore’s THREE homes…
New guest, Drew Johnson with the National Center for Public Policy Research, reviews a recent report on energy usage at the Nashville property of former Vice President Al Gore.
To read the article concerning this interview, click
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Wait a minute… Doesn’t Al Gore preach “Use less energy, especially fossil fuels”?
How did Drew Johnson obtain information about Al Gore’s Nashville home energy usage?
How much energy did Al Gore’s Nashville home devour last year as compared to the average American household?
How much energy did Al Gore’s Nashville home devour in the month of September 2016?
Does Al Gore have a private jet, a house boat, and numerous gas-guzzling SUV’s at his disposable?
Al Gore has a swimming pool and a hot tub. How much did it cost to heat the pool alone?
IIs this a clear example of “don’t do as I do, but do as I say”?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Al Gore is an Energy Hog
Topic: Environmental Issues
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
David Almasi is the Vice President of the National Center for Public
Policy Research. David will be discussing more information about
Al Gore and his hypocrisy.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
It must be nice for a single man to own a 10,000 square foot home… Does Al Gore
“walk the walk” or just “talk the talk”? Why does he need all
that space?
After it was discovered in 2007 that his home is an energy-hog, what
upgrades/remodeling has he done to bring down his energy usage? Was he
successful in his attempts? David Almasi describes some of the upgrades,
including “curly fry lights”.
Does Al Gore depend solely on green energy for his home? Can any home or
business rely solely on green energy?
Marketers of green energy are lying to the public. Should they be sued for false
advertising?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 23, 2017
Title: Gap, Inc. and the Homosexual Agenda
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Justin Danhof is the General Counsel for the National Center for Public Policy Research, as well as Director of the Center's
Free Enterprise Project. Listen in as he explains why Gap, Inc. supports the homosexual agenda in America, yet they are silent in other countries.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why doesn’t Gap, Inc. – with retail chains including, Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy, and others – take an active stand against the horrific treatment of homosexuals and women in foreign countries where they do business?
Is Gap, Inc. active in pushing the homosexual agenda in America?
Did Gap, Inc. sign on to a legal brief opposing North Carolina’s HB2 law?
Is this hypocritical?
Should Americans add Gap, Inc. and its affiliates to their list of stores to boycott?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 4, 2017
Title: Consistency Compared to Hypocrisy
Topic: Liberal Hypocrisy
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Left is at it again, and this time it’s the popular Coca-Cola Company.
In 2016, Coca-Cola lent its name to the group Georgia Prospers in opposition to a bill that would have protected religious institutions from having to perform functions that compromised their faith. Yet, Coca-Cola is heavily invested in countries that do not provide equal rights to Christians, gays, or women.
David Almasi is the Vice President at the National Center for Public Policy Research. Their Free Enterprise Project is the nation’s leading proponent of free-market investor activism.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does Coca-Cola invest/operate in countries that consider homosexuality a crime and where the penalty can be death?
How is a country/region defined as “high-risk”?
Instead of investing/operating in these high-risk countries, should Coca-Cola instead organize protests against those governments until they provide equal rights to all? Or does Coca-Cola care more about profits than people?
The National Center is a shareholder in Coca-Cola, which allows them to attend shareholder meetings and inquire about issues such as this. Listen as David describes the strides they are making in spreading the word about Coca-Cola’s double standards, as well as other companies.
To lend your support for the Free Enterprise Project and the National Center,
click here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 26, 2017
Title: The Truth About Climate Change - Part 2
Topic: Climate Change Bologna
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
In response to the large scale anti-Trump, pro-Green-Environment
march held on Earth Day, let’s take a look at the facts with Dr. Bonner Cohen,
the Environmental Scholar for the National Center for Public Policy
Research.
NOTE: Today, Dr. Bonner is representing the
Committee for a Constructive
Tomorrow (CFACT) as one of their Senior Policy Analysts.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is there a scientific consensus that man is causing cataclysmic, catastrophic
climate change because of man’s use of fossil fuels? Dr. Bonner Cohen says this:
“Anytime they say there is a consensus, this is a red flag. There is something
behind this that has nothing whatsoever to do with science.”
Do most Americans want to pay more for consumer goods?
Do most Americans want to pay more in fuel costs to drive their automobiles and
heat and cool their homes?
Will we all suffer massive job losses in order to pay for additional measures
for supposedly cleaner air, water, and to save more polar bears?
Is the US only contributing about five percent of the CO2 emitted world-wide
each year?
If the US dropped its CO2 emissions to zero, what effect would this have on
global temperatures?
What should parents and grandparents do to counter the lies taught to children in the public school systems?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 6, 2017
Title: Homeland Security in Jeopardy from a Wind Farm
Topic: Wind Energy
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
The Obama Administration wanted to pursue wind energy and other
alternatives at all costs, regardless of national security or the effect on
other aspects of life. Now, the Greenie Weenies have gone too far
this time. Our National Security is under threat – from a wind turbine farm!
Listen in as Dr. Bonner Cohen reveals what company this wind turbine farm will
be for. You may just cry a little….
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why is this particular wind turbine farm such a threat to National Security?
Listen closely as Dr. Bonner Cohen explains how this wind farm could potentially
place American lives at risk. It will absolutely astonish you!
More information in the next segment! Tune in!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Homeland Security in Jeopardy From a Wind Farm
Topic: Wind Energy
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is this new wind turbine farm providing electricity for the citizens of North
Carolina? HINT: Nope! It’s just for Amazon!
Listen as Dr. Bonner Cohen offers a little science lesson and research
information on wind turbine farms, specifically this new one for Amazon.
Is Amazon already utilizing the new wind turbine farm? Is this already
placing American lives at risk?
When wind energy is not available, what type of energy does Amazon use?
On average, how much energy does a wind farm produce? HINT:
It’s not much!
Is there a reasonable chance that the Trump Administration will inform
Amazon that the wind farm must go?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 3, 2016
Title: Freedom After Work
Topic: Christian Discrimination in America
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
It is a sad reality when employees must abandon their personal
beliefs at the workplace. But, is it a basic freedom to reclaim
those same beliefs in order to participate in non-work related activities,
without the fear of retribution from their employer?
Justin Danhof is with the National Center for Public Policy Research.
His division oversees their "Employee Conscience Protection Project".
Justin has been going into shareholder meetings across the country to ask CEOs,
upper management, and shareholders to allow certain freedoms to their workforce.
Currently, only about half of American workers live in a jurisdiction that
provides statutory protection against employer retaliation for engaging in First
Amendment activities. Some of these laws are weaker than others, and many
corporations do not offer this protection as a condition of employment.
In other words, the activities which employees participate in on their own time
should be left alone. Justin Danhof discusses the incident that brought to light
the seriousness of this issue. “The CEO of a company was ousted from his job
because liberal activists uncovered that he had donated to the Proposition 8
Marriage Amendment in California…with his own money.”
Listen in as Justin discusses the National Center’s efforts to convince major
corporations across the country to offer protections to the employees regarding
“off the clock” activities, including political activism. Most corporations they
have approached, such as Walmart, GE, Pfizer, Merck, Visa, PepsiCo, and Home
Depot, have accepted their proposal, protecting over 5 million people with new
corporate policies.
WARNING: All Starbucks and Costco lovers will NOT like the
following information, but it needs to be revealed. Both companies were founded
and currently directed by extreme, far-left leaning people. When Justin and the
National Center approached Starbucks and Costco with the very same proposal
which the above companies and others have already agreed to, their response was…
Listen in to hear more!
From college campuses to the board room, free speech, primarily for Christians,
is under attack. “It’s a totalitarian mindset,” Justin believes. “And it’s
only coming from liberal folks!” Don’t be afraid to speak out and stand up
on your own time. If you have questions or concerns about protections for you at
your job, click
here to learn more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 25, 2016
Title: Jail Climate Change Deniers
Topic: Jail Climate Change Deniers
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Portraying themselves as defenders of free speech, nineteen Democrat
Senators protested recently in the bowels of the US Senate chambers demanding
that those denying man is causing catastrophic, cataclysmic climate be punished
criminally and civilly.
Dr. Bonner Cohen is the Environment Scholar for the National Center for
Public Policy Research. Today he will be discussing the need to stop the
Democrats and the EPA once and for all.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Portraying themselves as defenders of the Constitution, did nineteen Democrat
Senators show their true colors as haters of anyone who disagrees with them?
Is this a blatant act of intimidation?
Do their actions depict a frontal attack on our First Amendment Right of Free
Speech? Dr. Bonner Cohen absolutely believes this to be true! In addition, he
says it is an attack on science. Listen in as he explains his position.
What are the Fundamentals of Scientific Inquiry using Global Warming/Climate
Change as the example?
You may be thinking: “Who cares?” Why should those in the middle-class
care? Why should Senior Citizens care? Why should all minorities care?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 20, 2016
Title: The Left is Muzzling You
Topic: Free Speech Rights
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The National Center for Public Policy Research is calling on a group
of high profile Senators working on the climate issue to prove they are not
hypocrites. The call comes after a marathon on the Senate floor
condemning dozens of conservative and free-market policy groups for not
endorsing the global warming theory.
Amy Ridenour is here today with all the details.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What are these Senators asking climate change “deniers” to do?
Why did the National Center ask specific Senators to prove they aren't
hypocrites?
Should politicians and candidates be subjected to “truth in advertising laws”?
Is climate change high on the average American’s priority lists?
Do Americans want higher energy prices to combat climate change?
Why don’t these environmentalists and others who believe the theory of
man-caused climate change just take us “deniers” to court?
To read Amy Ridenour’s full article, click
here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 16, 2016
Title: Target CEO has no Regrets
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Target has been making headlines for all the wrong reasons.
Justin Danhof is the Director of the Free Enterprise Project within the
National Center for Public Policy. Today, Justin will be discussing details
of the recent Target shareholders meeting where members of the National Center
asked company executives point-blank if they had regrets over their approval of
all-sex bathrooms and dressing rooms.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
First, why are members of the Free Enterprise Project attending various
shareholder meetings for different companies across the country?
What was Target's response to the National Center’s request to reverse their
decision on their bathroom policy?
The media has envisioned and portrayed tens of thousands of transgendered
individuals clamoring to use ‘the other facility’ at various businesses. Is this
true?
A while back, Target made the announcement that they would no longer be
separating boys and girls clothing or toys department. This angered a few
people. However, when Target made the decision to offer “free-range” bathrooms
and dressing rooms, they angered millions. Has this caused Target’s stock price
to drop? Have sales dropped as well?
Will Target’s decision place lives at risk?
Justin also discusses a specific question that he asked the CEO of Target
concerning his comparison of 1960’s racism to people who do not like the new
bathroom policy. The two are obviously not even comparable, but the left just
doesn’t see the difference.
Is the boycott of Target fading away? Where will you choose to
back-to-school-shop in August?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 25, 2016
Title: Religious Freedom Hangs in the Balance
Topic: Religious Freedom
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Some corporations are being used as front groups by left-wing
anti-religion coalitions. But, are they simple pawns or willing accomplices?
Justin Danhof is the Director of the Free Enterprise Project with the
National Center for Public Policy Research. He recently asked Home
Depot point blank if they oppose religious freedom because they belong to
the Georgia Prospers, a corporate coalition that lobbied extensively - and
dishonestly - against Georgia's religious freedom bill titled "The Free
Exercise Protection Act”.
When it comes to political involvement, most corporations – big and small – tend
to lean toward the left. Justin believes there are several very good reasons for
this: First, the left is very in-your-face concerning the social issues. Second,
there is a massive amount of hypocrisy in the media, as we all know.
Listen in as Justin discusses more about corporation’s involvement in political
matters and why it absolutely matters for all Americans. “Over the last year
and a half, it’s become very clear that this is where the left is taking the next major fight in this country,” he says. “But, when you poll the public, they are with the ‘common-sense movement’.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 27, 2016
Title: Climate Hustle Coming to a Theatre Near You!
Topic: Movie Review
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, and many left-leaning state
Attorney Generals are calling for organizations and individuals to be punished
for denying man-caused global warming. Of course, America’s
favorite jet-setting, millionaire Al Gore is in full agreement with such civil
and criminal penalties.
Dr. Bonner Cohen is a Senior Policy Analyst with the Committee for a
Constructive Tomorrow. He is also an internationally recognized expert on
natural resources. He is here today to discuss a new documentary, Climate
Hustle, which will be showing all across America on Monday, May 2, 2016. “There
have always been people who, in the name of protecting the planet, say we must
take urgent and drastic measures now,” Dr. Cohen states. What are things we
really shouldn’t do, though, to “save the planet”? Listen in as Dr. Cohen
explains why CO2 is really good for us and “they” are wrong!
There have been seventeen Ice Ages, for example, over the last two million years
(we’re not here to dispute how old the earth is). NONE of those Ice Ages began
or dissipated due to human activity or interference. So, how do the human-haters
explain the drastic ups and downs throughout history of the weather patterns? “They
ignore it,” Dr. Cohen declares. “They are very selective in what they
point to and what they leave out.”
Today’s climate is relatively stable. The question is this: Are we seeing any
extraordinary events that we have not seen in the past? NO! Dr. Cohen says, “The
movie addresses who is making these claims, why they are being made, and why the
science does not support the agreement.”
Listen in as Dr. Bonner Cohen explains more about the documentary, Climate
Hustle, and why it is a must-see, especially for those who aren’t sure
about the facts. He also encourages parents to take their children, grade-school
age and up, to see the film. “They are being spoon-fed what is pure
nonsense,” he states.
FACT: The first polar bear census was conducted globally in
1965 when there were between 12,000 and 13,000 polar bears. Now, there are over
25,000!
For ticket to see Climate Hustle, click
here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 5, 2016
Title: Freedom After Work
Topic: Christian Discrimination in America
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
It is a sad reality when employees must abandon their personal
beliefs at the workplace. But, is it a basic freedom to reclaim
those same beliefs in order to participate in non-work related activities,
without the fear of retribution from their employer?
Justin Danhof is with the National Center for Public Policy Research.
His division oversees their "Employee Conscience Protection Project".
Justin has been going into shareholder meetings across the country to ask CEOs,
upper management, and shareholders to allow certain freedoms to their workforce.
Currently, only about half of American workers live in a jurisdiction that
provides statutory protection against employer retaliation for engaging in First
Amendment activities. Some of these laws are weaker than others, and many
corporations do not offer this protection as a condition of employment.
In other words, the activities which employees participate in on their own time
should be left alone. Justin Danhof discusses the incident that brought to light
the seriousness of this issue. “The CEO of a company was ousted from his job
because liberal activists uncovered that he had donated to the Proposition 8
Marriage Amendment in California…with his own money.”
Listen in as Justin discusses the National Center’s efforts to convince major
corporations across the country to offer protections to the employees regarding
“off the clock” activities, including political activism. Most corporations they
have approached, such as Walmart, GE, Pfizer, Merck, Visa, PepsiCo, and Home
Depot, have accepted their proposal, protecting over 5 million people with new
corporate policies.
WARNING: All Starbucks and Costco lovers will NOT like the
following information, but it needs to be revealed. Both companies were founded
and currently directed by extreme, far-left leaning people. When Justin and the
National Center approached Starbucks and Costco with the very same proposal
which the above companies and others have already agreed to, their response was…
Listen in to hear more!
From college campuses to the board room, free speech, primarily for Christians,
is under attack. “It’s a totalitarian mindset,” Justin believes. “And it’s
only coming from liberal folks!” Don’t be afraid to speak out and stand up
on your own time. If you have questions or concerns about protections for you at
your job, click
here to learn more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 6, 2015
Title: What’s the Beef with Beef?
Topic: World Health Organization
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The World Health Organization (WHO) research department recently released a report stating processed meats cause cancer. Jeff Steir, the National Center for Public Policy Research Risk Analysis Director, is here today to say “It’s okay to eat bacon!!” Praise the Lord!
More importantly, however, Jeff explains how WHO came to the conclusion that processed meats are carcinogens. The World Health Organization Cancer Agency alleges that for each 50 grams of processed meats eaten daily, consumers increase their chance of colorectal cancer by 18%. Not “any type” of cancer only colon cancer. And this is not a certainty; it is just a “risk”.
“Without this context, it is easy to pay attention to the '18%' number without understanding context. It's like saying that living near a NASA facility triples your chances of getting hit by an errant space ship. It may be true, but it doesn't mean much,” Jeff Stier says. Furthermore, a person would need to eat this 50 grams of processed meat every single day for their entire life to meet this 18% expectation. That is highly unlikely.
As per usual, the MSM didn’t bother to dig deeper into the facts and started screaming “Don’t eat bacon! It will kill you!” PETA was cheering and applauding the fact that meat caused cancer. Why would anyone be happy that another human being was diagnosed with cancer? Simply put, PETA loves animals more than their fellow citizen.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 31, 2015
Title: Politicians and their Love of Medicare
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Is there any help and hope for Medicare?
Should every American citizen over
the age of 65 be forced to utilize Medicare for their health insurance needs?
The system is broke and adding more people to the fray will only make it worse,
in my opinion.
Dr. David Hogberg has a new book out "Medicare's Victims: How the U.S.
Government's Largest Health Care Program Harms Patients and Impairs Physicians”. The book reveals personal
stories of patients who have been harmed, as well as the struggles many
physicians face within the system.
David explains why Medicare is so popular, especially among politicians. “A lot
of the folks on Medicare have considerable political power, which basically
results in Congress making sure Medicare works for them.” He goes on to discuss
why using a Medicare-for-all system is a bad idea (duh – it comes from Barney
Frank!) and why politicians love healthy people (hint: sick people can’t help
block walk!). “Unless you’re from Chicago, your vote doesn’t count when you’re
dead!” – Dr. David Hogberg
Dr. David Hogberg also shares two of the stories he includes in his book. The facts don’t lie. While
there is a good outcome, will it be enough? Listen in and share with your
friends.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Politicians and their Love of Medicare
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
In this second
segment with Dr. David Hogberg, he reviews who matters and who doesn’t.
Under the current Medicare system, seniors have all the power and those who are
sick are thrown under the bus. However, he does have hope! He has some great new
ideas on how to reform Medicare in his new book, which can be purchased for
Kindle or on paperback [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 1, 2015
Title: Where’s the Beef? And the Chicken? And Even the Veggies?
Topic: GMO's
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Animal Rights
Activists are at it again. Jeff Stier, Director of Risk Analysis
for the National Center for Public Policy Research, says in a recently
published article in the San Diego Union Tribute, “Animal ‘rights’
activists scored a victory earlier this year – not in court, but through
political tactics….These cases are part of a broader campaign in which radical
activists purposefully seek to blur the important distinction between ‘animal
welfare’ and “animal rights.”
Simply put, animal welfare is the notion shared by all decent humans that we
should take good care of animals. Animal rights, on the other hand, is a system
where whales can be considered slaves and research chimpanzees have personhood.
In fact, they want all animals, domesticated or not, to be protected under the
13th Amendment.
Animal welfare is important. We must protect and care for all God’s creatures.
Jeff says, however, that these activists are doing more harm than good. He urges
people to support your local animal shelters, but be wary of PETA and
Human Society groups. Listen in as he explains how well-known animal rights
groups actually spend donation money.
SHOCKING FACT: PETA actually has a program called “Holocaust
on a Plate” which compares the killing of animals to the killing of
millions of people at the hands of evil men. This is becoming the centralized
issue in their agenda and, unfortunately, it is working.
Jeff’s article on this issue can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 29, 2015
Title: The Truth about GMO’s
Topic: GMO's
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The European Union
spent ten years and hundreds of millions of Euros to exhaustively examine GMOs,
determining: "The main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than
130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and
involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and
in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than conventional plant breeding
technologies." Read that again… Basically the UN is admitting
they’ve been LYING to the entire world when they claim that GMO’s and DDT’s
kill, harm, or poison people and animals.
Justin Danhof understands that people may have a difficult time grasping this
new information. We’ve been lied to so often about GMO’s that it will take a lot
of convincing for some people to change their thought process. Rich Hollywood
celebrities and others spread fear through TV shows, blogs, and 140-character
Twitter tirades which millions of people read and accept as fact.
Justin explains how the “Genetic Literacy Project has compiled over 2,500
independent studies that have all verified that GMO’s are perfectly safe for
human consumption.” In fact, NO ONE has ever gotten sick from GMO’s in
their food. It is a proven, scientific fact.
Justin’s biggest problem with the lies about GMO’s is the harm caused to
low-income people and those in third-world countries. People in India, for
example, are suffering blindness, serious illness, and even death due to a lack
of Vitamin A deficiency because environmentalists won’t allow the government to
use GMO’s in the food! Their entire thought process on the matter is just
insane. In fact, Justin says “they have blood on their hands.” Click [here]
for more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 27, 2015
Title: GE, The Clinton Foundation, and Algeria
Topic: Government Contract
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
GE donated money to
The Clinton Foundation. Is it just a coincidence that GE then received
a $1.9 Billion contract from Algeria? Justin Danhof is the General
Counsel for The National Center for Public Policy Research, as well as
Director of the Center's Free Enterprise Project. Justin and others are
buying stock in big corporations in order to attend their annual stockholder’s
meetings. Why?
The American people always seem to be the loser when big government and big
companies work together. “We’re there to drive a wedge between them,”
Justin says.
Most of you have heard by now that Hillary Clinton deleted thousands upon
thousands of emails and erased her computer hard drive. Liberals see nothing
wrong with this. Conservatives, however, know this is bad, bad news for our
entire county.
American corporations are going to foreign countries and bribing them with cash
in exchange for lucrative contracts. Is this even legal? Technically, no.
However, big corporations get around this negative practice in other ways.
Technically, still illegal, but they do it anyway.
Justin Danhof has given GE an ultimatum: Let us see your emails. Listen in as he
discusses “honest services fraud” and why it is so important for the
emails to become public.
For more on this and other issues affecting America, click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 2, 2015
Title: The Consequences of Medicare and Medicaid
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Bipartisan support for a bill usually means trouble for Americans. Just look
at the stimulus package and Obamacare, two of the biggest disasters in American history. Since 2003, Congress has passed – and then suspended – seventeen new rules regarding Medicaid spending.
There are unintended consequences (and some intentional ones!) when lawmakers pass a bill – any bill. It’s hard to know what the future will hold. “Congress is trying to get rid of the Sustainable Growth Rate,” explains Dr. Hogberg of new legislation concerning Medicare and Medicaid. Listen in as Dr. Hogberg explains this “Doc Fix” and discusses MIPS: Merit-based Incentive Program for the doctor. Doctors are rewarded for healthy patients but punished for sick patients. Isn’t a doctor’s job to cure sick patients?
Not every doctor will have the same mix of patients. For instance, “A doctor in New York City will have a different type of patient than, say, doctors in Manhattan, Kansas,” David believes. So, how can Congress expect to offer the exact same incentives to every doctor across the nation?
But what about the intended consequences of this bill? Could this law affect your healthcare or that of a loved one? Will your doctor just quit because they care too much about their sick patients? David Hogberg explains this in part – but listen to the second segment with him to hear more!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - The Consequences of Medicare and Medicaid
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
“The intended consequence
(of MIPS) is to reward doctors for providing quality treatment. The unintended
consequence is that doctors will be encouraged to only accept or see healthy
patients because then they get better scores on these quality measures,”
Dr. Hogberg explains of the MIPS: Merit-based Incentive Program.
Another aspect of this bill which disturbs David is the fact that it does not
include the measures by which doctors are to be judged! Listen in as he explains
this one.
David says the intent of this bill is to lower the cost of Medicaid. However, it
will probably have the opposite effect. “The best and brightest doctors are
going to avoid the sickest patients because they realize they get paid more for
the healthy ones!”
Please contact your Congressmen and urge them to vote against this bill, or to
at least strike or remove MIPS from the bill.
For more on this and other issues affecting our country, click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 27, 2015
Title: Fighting Crony Capitalism
Topic: Crony Capitalism
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Apple President Tim
Cook stated: “Apple is more interested in green energy than green profits.”
But what he is really saying, according to Justin Danhof is: “Essentially,
if you were to believe everything that comes out of Tim’s mouth, you’d believe
that they (Apple) were running a humanitarian non-profit venture.” Listen
in as Justin explains what is going on with Apple.
Another company that has been in the news recently is Costco for discriminating
against employees who disagree with their “politics” on their own time. Justin
discusses the “Employee Conscious Protection Project” (ECPP), which would allow
workers the freedom to participate in politics on their own time, with their own
money, without fear of retribution from the employer. GE, Pepsi, and Walmart are
just a few of the big-name corporations that have already added the ECPP to
their employees’ contracts. Why won’t Costco?
Justin says it all boils down to money. Listen in as he clarifies his opinion. “Free
markets are worth fighting for and we’re going to be on the front lines
continuing that battle.”
Justin Danhof is the General Counsel for the National Center for Public
Policy Research, as well as Director of the Center's Free Enterprise
Project. They can be found [here].
Justin’s article on this issue is [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 11, 2015
Title: Alternatives to Obamacare
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
We all know that the Main Stream
Media (MSM) are lying liars. They are once again spreading propaganda about the
Political Right, saying the GOP has no plans to replace or replenish subsidies
within Obamacare if the Supreme Court rules in favor of the plaintiff (in the
case King vs. Burwell).
Well, MSM, you are wrong. Republicans and Libertarians alike have presented
numerous options for the public to choose from in order to continue receiving
medical coverage in exchange for Obamacare subsidies.
What is the lawsuit King vs. Burwell? Does it abolish Obamacare? Does it help
Obamacare? Does it just replace some of Obamacare?
Listen in as Dr. Hogberg explains the lawsuit, the new options, and what they
mean to millions of Americans. And don’t be afraid of a lot of big, fancy words!
Dr. David has put it laymen’s terms so everybody can understand it! (Unlike that
other large reference book (ahem Obamacare) that no one in Congress even read
before they passed it.)
Quote of the day: “Obamacare took the problems that were already there and just
put them on steroids.”
Dr. Hogberg’s study can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 11, 2015
Title: Do you work for a 'Partisan Purity Shop'?
Topic: Workplace Political Discrimination
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In today’s society, technology is at our fingertips 24/7 with smart phones,
iPads, and laptops. On average, people check their cell phones over 100 times
every day. We are constantly opening Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram to see if
someone liked a post or commented on something. And let’s face it: you like
pictures of cute little animals just as much as I do.
For those of us who are politically active, we use social media to repost
articles that interest us. We “follow” pages of our favorite political
candidates. We share memes of Brian Williams’ “accomplishments”. Did I just type
that out loud?
“Workplace discipline” is a very real thing. Texas is a “right to work” state,
which means an employer can fire an employee for any – or no – reason
whatsoever, including political beliefs. But shouldn’t a person’s private life
be “private”? Does an employer have the right to pry into employee’s social
media accounts?
A common misconception people have is that the First Amendment protects their
right to free speech, no matter where, no matter what. Shockingly, only half of
all Americans are protected under a law which allows their private life to
actually stay “private”.
Listen in as Justin Danhof explains the battle they have initiated to help
protect employees from discrimination based on their political beliefs. The
project is called the “Employee Conscience Protection Project”. More can be
found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Do you work for a 'Partisan Purity Shop'?
Topic: Workplace Political Discrimination
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
In the first segment, Justin
Danhof explains how employers in Texas can hire and fire anyone at any given
time. If your employer is a flaming Liberal and doesn’t like your Dan Patrick
bumper sticker, you can be fired! If you are still a die-hard Obama-lover and
your boss is descendent of the Bush clan, he can kick you to the curb! It
doesn’t matter which side of the political realm you side with; your political
opinions are “your” political opinions. You should never be pressured to keep
silent for fear of losing your job.
Are there any good companies out there who allow their employees private lives
to stay “private”? Are there some bad apples? Over the past few months, Justin
and others with the “Employee Conscience Protection Project” have asked some of
the biggest corporations to allow specific protections to their employees
regarding political opinions and private matters, including information on
social media.
Listen in as Justin gives the juicy details about the good companies and those
you might want to steer clear of. HINT: Do you shop at Costco? Are you employed
by Coca-Cola? Do you have a Visa credit card? Who is good and who is
baaaaaaaaaaad to the bone?
To learn more about the National Center for Public Policy Research click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 10, 2015
Title: Is a Bigger Prison Still a Prison?
Topic: Animal Rights Gone Crazy
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
PETA believes that
human kind should not own or keep any animal from land or the sea.
No dogs. No cats. No horses. No chickens. No goldfish. No hermit crabs. No
whales. No dolphins. Nothing. They don’t belong to us. They belong to the earth.
In fact, PETA believes that all animals are equal to humans. They deserve the
same rights as humans. Jeff Stier, with the National Center for Public Policy
Research, takes offense to that. While Jeff is an animal lover and he does think
we should take care of them, they are NOT equal to humans and do NOT deserve the
same rights as us.
Listen in as he explains how a Legislator in Washington filed a bill to ban the
keeping of whales and dolphins. SeaWorld is trying their best to accommodate
PETA by building bigger tanks, but that’s just not good enough! PETA says
keeping whales and dolphins and all sea creatures down to the tiniest clown fish
is imprisonment! The whales were being held in bondage – in slavery! PETA says
SeaWorld is enslaving whales and dolphins in captivity! Give me a break!!!
The sad thing is that movies which depict suffering animals such as whales and
dolphins have such a negative impact that PETA is actually winning this battle!
And it’s not just about whales and dolphins. PETA is after your dog and cat;
they’re after the cows and chickens. They’re also after the zoo!
Listen in as Jeff explains more about PETA’s worldview. He also encourages PETA
members to lead by example.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 17, 2014
Title: Eight Lies Told by Obamacare Supporters
Topic: Obamacare Lies
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Politicians are allowed to lie. On TV, on radio, and even right to your face.
They can lie to you. It’s even been approved by the courts, who say it’s up to
you, the voter, to decipher what is a lie and what is the truth. But who has
time for that? Well, that’s what I’m here for! I am not a politician. I am just
a man, a messenger, who wants you to know the truth.
When it comes to Obamacare, we have been fed a lot of lies. David Hogberg says
there are eight lies told by Obamacare supporters, one of whom is the infamous
Jonathan Gruber. Gruber testified under oath concerning Obamacare, and most have
heard that he outright lied. Why is he not being prosecuted for his lies? Will
he be?
Listen in as David Hogberg explains the congressional intent, the records, and
what could happen.
You can find David’s full article, Eight Lies Told by
Obamacare Supporters [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Eight Lies Told by Obamacare Supporters
Topic: Obamacare Lies
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
After hearing
testimony from Gruber and others, David Hogberg believes that the writers and
supporters of Obamacare knew they were lying to the public. They knew it would
have devastating effects, but they did it anyway. How is this not illegal?
In this segment with David today, he really digs into some of the Eight Lies
Told by Obamacare Supporters. People on federal exchanges are supposed to
receive premium subsidies. Lie! We were told by Pelosi and Harry Reid, even
Obama himself, that we could keep our current healthcare plan. Lie!
What about Congress? Were they in the dark like the rest of us? Or were some of
them part of the whole scheme? David Hogberg has an interesting opinion on this
matter as well! Listen in!
You can find David’s full article, Eight Lies Told by
Obamacare Supporters [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 8, 2014
Title: Before you Move, Check Doctor Availability.
Topic: Finding a Doctor As We Age
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
More and more doctors are refusing to accept new Medicare patients. In fact, over the last decade, the number has increased from 10 percent to 17 percent.
That may not seem like many, but it is huge – especially in rural areas. That is a 70% jump!
Dr. David Hogberg points out that every few years, Medicare threatens to drastically reduce what it reimburses physicians for medical costs. This is a direct result of the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR).
Dr. Hogberg explains what this means to people who are looking to retire. (Note: More on this subject in the second segment with Dr. Hogberg.)
Dr. Hogberg also says it is important to research doctors and specialists in the area you wish to retire to make certain there are choices available for Medicare patients.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Doctors. Money. And Liars.
Topic: Medicare Payment Problems
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
What is the “Doc Fix” process? Dr. David Hogberg explains how a law passed in 1997 by Congress called the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) created a threshold for Medicare physician fees. He explained how this affects retirees in the first segment. Now, he goes further and explains how doctors reacted to this law.
One of the consequences of the SGR is the physician fees. The current proposal that will come up in the next session includes a cut of 25%. This is huge! For obvious reasons, this is causing a great deal of fear and uncertainty in doctors. Many doctors have chosen to simply stop accepting new Medicare patients. Some use a cost shifting scheme, charging cash-paying patients more for services. Others drop all Medicare patients altogether.
And what in the world is the Kabuki dance? Can we talk about that on family-friendly, Christian radio? Listen in as Dr. Hogberg explains this one!!!
Is there any hope at all that Congress will repeal the SGR permanently? Can they do it? Dr. Hogberg is optimistic that the newly elected Congress will do the right thing and allow doctors to just be doctors.
You can find more on this and other issues facing our great nation at
www.NationalCenter.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 3, 2014
Title: Yes, Hillary, I DID Create that Job!
Topic: Businesses Do Not Create Jobs (Wrong – They Do!)
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Hilary Clinton is following in President Obama’s footsteps. Again.
Remember when the President said that businesses don’t create jobs? Well, Hilary
said the same thing last week. And, boy oh boy, is she trying to back pedal!
Hilary tried to “explain” what she meant by saying it was the tax cuts on
businesses. Say what?!?! That makes even less sense, Mrs. Clinton!
Amy Ridenour is the Chairman for the National Center for Public Policy
Research. She explains how businesses do, in fact, create jobs. They are,
after all, part of the commerce system. And the commerce system exists to create
jobs, flooding the economy with goods and services, which in turn creates more
jobs to make more goods and services, and so on.
There is a new report circulating which involves Hilary, Russia, and Boeing.
When Hilary Clinton was the Secretary of State, Boeing obtained a multi-Billion
dollar contract to build new planes on American soil. Now, there is information
that Boeing, a Russian company, gave the Clinton Foundation $900,000 during the
same time frame!
Listen in as Amy Ridenour discusses the seriousness of this report – and how
many other companies have donated money to the Clinton Foundation in order to
obtain favors from the American government! The National Center for Public
Policy Research has filed a subpoena with the Department of Justice for emails
and all communication regarding this matter. Does Amy believe the DOJ will even
acknowledge the issue?
You can find more on this and other issues affecting our country at
www.NationalCenter.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 15, 2014
Title: ENT Doc says the U.S. is Not Prepared for Ebola
Topic: Ebola
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
How contagious is Ebola? Dr. Elaina George says that most Americans do not
have a robust, healthy immune system. We may think we do, but we really don’t.
In fact, she says: "We eat processed foods, we don't sleep well, we don't take
care of ourselves, and we're living under a great deal of stress, and by
definition that will all affect the immune system."
The CDC is saying they are “absolutely certain” Ebola is not an “airborne
disease”. Dr. George says that, when it comes to diseases, you can never be
“absolutely certain” because they are constantly changing and adapting to their
environment. In fact, Ebola has already mutated about 400 times!
No one is exempt when it comes to Ebola. No one. Even if the infected person is
not showing symptoms, Ebola can still be passed from person to person.
Dr. Elaina George is an Ear Nose and Throat Physician with a wealth of
information about Ebola and the Enterovirus D68. Today, she is here to discuss
some useful guidelines to help keep you and your family safe and healthy. She
even recommends that you have plenty of supplies on hand in case of a quarantine
– food, water, medicine, gas for cars, cash on hand.
Dr. George also suggests that the US immediately execute measures to delay or
stop travel from countries where outbreaks have occurred or quarantining people
who do travel from those countries. You can find Dr. George at
www.DrElainaGeorage.com or
www.PeachTreeCenter.com.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 6, 2014
Title: The EPA Wants to Regulate YOUR Puddle
Topic: EPA to Regulate Your Puddle and Ditch
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
If you currently own
land anywhere in the continental United States, or if you have plans to buy land
in the future, listen to this segment with a pen and paper in hand, ready to
take notes. Rules and regulations could change – drastically.
Dr. Bonner Cohen is with the National Center for Public Policy Research. He
discusses how the EPA has the power to classify land as a “wetland”. There is
new legislation being considered in Washington DC that will significantly affect
land ownership in the United States.
Some examples of the changes proposed by the EPA: A puddle could be regulated by
the EPA. Even on your land. A tiny, little puddle with ¼ of an inch of rain. Do
you have a natural-flowing ditch in your backyard? Well, according to the
pending legislation, a ditch in your backyard could require a permit from the
EPA. So ridiculous!
Make sure you listen in to the next segment to hear more information about the
newest and utterly outrageous EPA proposal. Then share these segments with your
friends on Facebook and followers on Twitter. Email your entire list of
contacts. If your friends own a plot of land, they will thank you!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - The EPA Wants to Regulate YOUR Puddle
Topic: EPA to Regulate Your Puddle and Ditch
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
It doesn’t matter if the land
you own is arid or flooded, the EPA wants to regulate it. Even if there is a
simple puddle, the EPA wants to control that puddle. We all know the EPA is a
power-hungry government agency, but this is just getting out of hand.
So, what exactly are “navigable” waters, and why does the EPA want to take this
single word out of the original statute? What other new proposals is the EPA
making in regards to private land ownership? These new proposed regulations are
going to make it that much easier for any person – whether it be a private
citizen or a government worker – to file suit against if you have even one
single puddle on your land. This also applies to stock ponds, which are often
found on farms and ranches.
Dr. Bonner Cohen discusses two Supreme Court decisions which actually made it
harder for the EPA to regulate private land. Now that Obama has appointed two
new environmentally-friendly Justices, the EPA is trying once again to get their
hands on your land. Even if a “body of water” (aka puddle) exists for a matter a
days, if the EPA knows about it, they’ll regulate it and fine you if you don’t
comply with their rules!
Remember to call or email your elected officials and urge them to deny the EPA
further control of private land ownership. It doesn’t matter if your elected
officials are Republican or Democrat – many from both sides are against this
proposal. You can always find more information on this at
www.NationalCenter.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 24, 2014
Title: Promise Maker. Promise Breaker.
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
It really shouldn’t
be a surprise that Obamacare is a big mess. Pretty much everything Obama has
touched has been awful, but I don’t think anyone was prepared for just how bad
Obamacare has turned out to be.
Dr. David Hogberg is a Senior Fellow for Health Care Policy at the National
Center for Public Policy Research. He says that one of the biggest complaints
from people who signed up for Obamacare is that the new plans are far worse than
what they previously had through company or private insurance. In fact, over 30%
of the respondents to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey said the policies
were “not good” or “poor”.
David decided to do his own research and what he found is just absolutely
astonishing. First, he looked at the markets in ten large US cities and compared
plans for 27 year old single adults and 57 year old couples. Listen in to find
out the results!
In addition, Dr. Hogberg says that the ten benefits which must be covered by
Obamacare are ridiculous. Not every person needs maternity coverage. Not every
person need substance abuse services. Not every person needs pediatric coverage.
Why can’t people pick and choose the services they want to be covered? They
could before Obamacare!
If we can’t convince the puppets in DC to repeal the whole thing altogether, one
solution to this big ol’ mess of Obamacare is to at least offer al-a-cart
policies so 50-somethings don’t have to pay for maternity services they’ll never
use and 20-somethings don’t have to pay for preventive care services they won’t
need for another 20 years.
To learn more on Obamacare and other issues facing our nation, log on to
www.NationalCenter.org.
To read the results of Dr. Hogber's research click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 9, 2014
Title: Increasing Threat of Diseases from Illegals
Topic: Illegal Immigrants and Airborne Diseases
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The government would
never allow animals to enter our borders from other countries without a thorough
health examination. The government would never allow fruits and
vegetables from other countries – or even states within our borders – to be
placed on shelves to sell to the public without ensuring they were safe to eat.
Why, then, is the government allowing thousands upon hundreds of thousands of
children and men and women from Mexico, The Middle East, and other countries to
come here illegally? A very low percentage of these illegals are being screened
for communicable diseases and the children are not being vaccinated before they
attend school.
Dr. Elaina George says the government is just being irresponsible; they are
risking the lives of millions of people for votes. Dr. George also points out
the blatant double standard the government has regarding vaccinations for
school-aged children.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 17, 2014
Title: The Coming Health Insurance Company Bailout
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The models used to develop Obamacare are not working. Young, healthy workers are not buying Obamacare policies. Families are not buying coverage, opting to pay cash when they get sick.
Dr. David Hogberg says when the health insurance lobbyists helped write the Obamacare legislation, they knew they would lose money. They purposefully and consciously wrote in safety nets for themselves to cover future losses.
Listen in as David describes recent conversations with the CEO’s of Wellpoint, Humana, and Aetna. Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 25, 2014
Title: Obama's Awful Commencement Speech
Topic: Obama
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Amy Ridenour says the following concerning Obama’s recent
commencement speech at the University of California at Irvine:
“It was inappropriate for President Obama to use his commencement
address…for a divisive speech promoting his own views on climate change. He
hijacked other people's commencement to promote his own views on a contentious
issue, no doubt leaving some of the graduates who hold differing views angry and
frustrated on an occasion that is supposed to be in their honor.”
What’s worse is that Obama even had his facts wrong!
Listen in as Amy explains.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 10, 2014
Title: The Coming Health Insurance Company Bailout
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The models used to develop Obamacare are not working. Young, healthy workers are not buying Obamacare policies. Families are not buying coverage, opting to pay cash when they get sick.
Dr. David Hogberg says when the health insurance lobbyists helped write the Obamacare legislation, they knew they would lose money. They purposefully and consciously wrote in safety nets for themselves to cover future losses.
Listen in as David describes recent conversations with the CEO’s of Wellpoint, Humana, and Aetna. Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 9, 2014
Title: Top Ten Reasons Washington Should not Impose New Global Warming Laws or Regulations
Topic: Global Scaring
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In this first segment with Amy Ridenour, she answers four of the top questions thinking-people have concerning global warming:
1. Is the world warming?
2. Who is really harmed by the push to reduce fossil fuels?
3. Who leads the world today in reducing CO2 emissions?
4. Are global warming climate modules accurately predicting what is happening in the real world?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Global Scaring
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Regulations have goon too far. We especially don’t need any NEW regulations. Listen in as Amy discusses the other six reasons:
5 Are claims that 97% of the world’s scientists endorse global warming true?
6 Is the UN using scientists to write policy papers or is the UN using politicians?
7 As predictions do NOT come about, do the fossil fuel haters simply change their predictions?
8 Ice coverage around the world will disappear soon unless we all stop using fossil fuels – true or false?
9 If we stop using fossil fuels, what will we use?
And #10... Listen in to find out!
Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 21, 2014
Title: Snap Obamacare with Sure Cures
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
Just because everyone is promised health insurance, does not mean everyone
will receive health care of high quality and service will be uniformly available
in a timely manner for all. The government is now attempting to control
everything - from the doctors’ treatment options to patient choices about
coverage.
Dr. Elaina George is a solo practitioner in private practice and is also a small
business owner. She has a unique perspective on the problems of health care
delivery, the true costs of healthcare, and viable solutions.
Today, Dr. George discusses whether or not elite Democrats have conspired with
insurance companies, hospital executives, and the pharmaceutical industry to
successfully insert government bureaucrats between the doctor and the patient.
Also, are doctors really bad, greedy demons who need to be controlled?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
While politicians focus on
winning at all costs, a transfer of health and of wealth has begun. A two-tier
system is evolving. It consists of those trapped under ObamaCare and those who
can afford to opt-out to pursue the best treatment available.
Dr. Elaina George says that an independent doctor is the best alternative.
Listen in as she explains.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
If you are
frustrated with Obamacare like so many other Americans, there are some
common-sense, workable solutions available to ease your mind.
Urgent Care Centers are often cheaper than the traditional ER. They usually
charge a flat fee for services and you will know ahead of time what your costs
will be. Also, those in need of surgery have several options for cheaper
services, such as the Surgery Center of Oklahoma (
www.surgerycenterok.com) and
Medibid (www.medibid.com) where you can
bid on medical costs.
Listen in as Dr. George shares other cost-saving alternatives to Obamacare.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 17, 2014
Title: Do Not Buy Apple Stock
Topic: Political Correctness
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
At a recent shareholder meeting, the CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, lost it. Why?
Listen in as Justin Danhoff with the National Center for Public Policy Research
explains.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Political Correctness
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Apple, obviously, is a very
wealthy company. They could do a lot of good – or harm – to the American economy
without much effort.
Justin Danhof discusses whether or not Apple should continue to invest in
certain activities without tax payer subsidies.
Log on to www.NationalCenter.org to learn more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 10, 2014
Title: Obamacare: Paying More for Less
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
A new study shows
that 27 year old single adults and couples in their late 50’s actually had MORE
healthcare options than before Obamacare. Surprise. Surprise. Surprise.
Politicians are protected BY LAW, allowing them to knowingly and purposefully
lie to the American public in order for their agenda to be more appealing.
Dr. David Hogberg, with the National Center for Public Policy Research, says, “ObamaCare
supporters, including the president himself and Nancy Pelosi, claimed the
exchanges would yield more choice and lower prices. This study shows those
claims do not stand up.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The reality is beginning to sink
in for the millions of people who voted for Obama and allowed him and the
liberals to implement Obamacare. They are frustrated over the issues with the
enrollment website. They are angry they cannot keep their current plan or
doctor. They are furious over the higher prices for less services.
We tried to warn them. We told them this would happen. Now, what can be done to
fix it?
Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 27, 2014
Title: ObamaCare's Victims
Topic: ObamaCare’s Victims
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
At least 5 million people – possibly more – have lost their insurance
coverage due to the implementation of ObamaCare. Millions more will be losing
their health insurance in the coming months.
Americans who work for a small business, which is defined as a company with less
than 50 employees, will lose their coverage because the “Affordable Care Act”
now deems their employer-provided policies illegal. Rather than pay the high
premiums, many employers will choose to cancel their coverage and have their
employees join the exchange.
Dr. David Hogberg, with the National Center for Public Policy Research,
explains.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: part 2 of 3
Topic: ObamaCare’s Victims
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
“If you like your doctor, you
can keep your doctor.” That’s what they told us. That’s what many believed.
“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.” They told us that, too. And,
again, many believed it was true.
Both of these statements turned out to be blatant lies. Is it time the American
people demand that ObamaCare be repealed indefinitely? Listen in to hear what
Dr. Hogberg has to say.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3
Topic: ObamaCare’s Victims
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
31 MILLION people
will potentially lose their insurance coverage this year. This is
absolutely unacceptable, folks. The stress this will place on families,
business, and the economy will be felt for years to come.
Dr. David Hogberg is with the National Center for Public Policy Research.
Learn more about the work they do for you at
www.NationalCenter.org.
HOST’S NOTE: You have the opportunity to stop this. Vote on Tuesday,
March 4 in the Republican Primary. You can find your voting location on our home
page.
The battle does not end there. It continues through November – and beyond.
Volunteer to make calls for a campaign once or twice a month. Take snacks to the
campaign headquarters. Knock on doors in your neighborhood.
The Democrats want to take over Texas. We cannot let this happen! Do your part –
for your children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 30, 2013
Title: Should they be Shuttered for Being so Way off Target?
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In 2002, commenting on the possibility that Iraq had supplied or might supply
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to terrorists, Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary
of Defense, famously said: "...there are known knowns... There are known
unknowns... But there are also unknown unknowns - there are things we do not
know we don't know."
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been wrong seven of the past 10 years. Their credibility should be in the tanks.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Now the public has learned we
are in the midst of a 17-year “pause” in global warming that not one of the 73
climate models us by the U.N. predicted.
Count them: 73… all W.R.O.N.G.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been wrong 7 of the past
10 years. Being wrong so frequently poses a more significant risk to NOAA than
just a little embarrassment. It threatens to undermine the agency's credibility,
undermine the public's faith in even its short-range forecasts, and ultimately
place lives at risk.
We are NOT in a global warming period. Period. The Global Warming Alarmists should have no credibility, zero, zilch, nada…none.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 6, 2013
Title: Should they be Shuttered for Being so Way off Target?
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In 2002, commenting on the possibility that Iraq had supplied or might supply
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to terrorists, Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary
of Defense, famously said: "...there are known knowns... There are known
unknowns... But there are also unknown unknowns - there are things we do not
know we don't know."
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been wrong seven of the past 10 years. Their credibility should be in the tanks.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Now the public has learned we
are in the midst of a 17-year “pause” in global warming that not one of the 73
climate models us by the U.N. predicted.
Count them: 73… all W.R.O.N.G.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been wrong 7 of the past
10 years. Being wrong so frequently poses a more significant risk to NOAA than
just a little embarrassment. It threatens to undermine the agency's credibility,
undermine the public's faith in even its short-range forecasts, and ultimately
place lives at risk.
We are NOT in a global warming period. Period. The Global Warming Alarmists should have no credibility, zero, zilch, nada…none.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 12, 2013
Title: Did Dem’s In DC Force $4 Million in Payoffs From Wal-Mart?
Topic: Political Bribes Forced From Wal-Mart
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
Some members serving on the Washington DC City Council should be investigated
for forcing Wal-Mart to pay over $4 million to non-profits in the city in
exchange for favorable votes. This should be headline news.
Wal-Mart bent over backwards to accommodate the District’s requirements
concerning location, staffing, minority contracting, transportation, non-profit
support, and many other onerous demands from the city’s leaders just to have the
opportunity to bring jobs and prosperity to areas suffering 17.8 % unemployment.
Exempting union shops, the City’s leaders passed a Super-Minimum Wage targeting
Wal-Mart and other non-union big box retailers. Listen in…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Wal-Mart Did Not Bend Over Far Enough!
Topic: Political Bribes Forced From Wal-Mart
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 2 of 3
Wal-Mart has been
bending over backwards for DC officials for over eleven years.
Wal-Mart has even given over $4 million to the city’s non-profit organizations.
Wal-Mart even agreed to build stores in the worst areas of town – where few
would travel, park, or walk inside to shop.
Face the facts: City officials receive paybacks from union officials to keep
non-unions out of the city. Face more facts: DC unemployment rate is at 8.5%
which is one percent higher than the national average. However, the
African-American unemployment rate is 17.8%.
DC officials made their union bosses happy. Some non-profits must be crying,
“Where is our money? Squeeze them some more.” Listen in…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Nearly Two Thousand Jobs Axed Because of Union Bosses.
Topic: Political Bribes Forced From Wal-Mart
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 3 of 3
Nearly two thousand
jobs axed because union bosses did not want the non-union Wal-Mart in town.
DC officials showed disregard for minorities, seniors, and all who are
without jobs.
Wal-Mart bent over backwards to accommodate the District’s requirements
concerning location, staffing, minority contracting, transportation, non-profit
support, and many other onerous demands from the city’s leaders just to have the
opportunity to bring jobs and prosperity to areas suffering 17.8 % unemployment.
Our guest, Justin Danhof, demands an investigation into political contributions
received by DC officials. This is a clear case of ‘Political Payback’. Listen
in…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 17, 2013
Title: Watch our Violent TV Shows, Drive Up our Ratings, But DON’T Buy Guns or Ammo!
Topic: Hypocrisy in the Lime Light
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Most Americans are
under the false impression that gun violence is on the rise. This
is mostly due to the left shifting news stories and twisting public opinion
toward anti-gun legislation.
Back in March 2013, Comcast announced that they would no longer air commercials
for guns or ammunitions during breaks for their TV programs, which are often
filled with violence, guns, and murder.
What hypocrites!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 22, 2013
Title: Happy Lenin’s Birthday / Earth Day!
Topic: Earth Day
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Earth Day is a day set aside to
celebrate “Mother Earth” and just so happens to coincide with the socialist
tyrant Vladimir Lenin birthday. Dr. Bonner Cohen, senior fellow at the National
Center for Public Policy, says this is no “coincidence”. Green politics, touted
by the elite and self-appointed stewards of the environment are actually
servants of the environmental activists and crony capitalists.
They keep raising the cost of food, electricity, and transportation, but in
reality are doing more harm than good!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 14, 2013
Title: EPA is so Desperate they are Making up Fake Mines!
Topic: Environmental Issues
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
The EPA has pulled some fast ones before but nothing compared this!
Dr. Bonner Cohen is a frequent guest on the What’s UP Radio Program and he’s here with all juicy details on how a 12-member panel harshly criticized the EPA after its most recent stunt. Of course, the MSM didn’t say a word about it!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Environmental Issues
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Alaska is home to countless reserves for copper and gold, as well as other precious metals which could create thousands and thousands of jobs in Alaska and throughout the US.
But the EPA stops this progress time and time again. I will never understand why the EPA is so dead-set against creating American jobs and growing the economy. It’s almost as if they purposefully want to ruin America.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 3, 2013
Title: God Belches 9-10,000 TONS of Mercury into the air every year!
Topic: Coal Plants
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Environmentalists have been pushing to close coal plants for years because they are bad for our environment. Yes, we need to take care of our planet. But God did give us certain natural resources for a reason.
Let’s put things into perspective…Coal plants in America only account for half of one percent of all the mercury in the air, emitting about 41-48 tons of mercury every year. By comparison, forest fires emit 44 tons per year. China emits 400 tons of mercury every year. And God is the worst culprit of all, emitting 9-10,000 tons by way of volcanoes and geysers. So who sues God?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 4, 2012
Title: God Belches 9-10,000 TONS of Mercury into the air every year!
Topic: Coal Plants
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Environmentalists have been pushing to close coal plants for years because they are bad for our environment. Yes, we need to take care of our planet. But God did give us certain natural resources for a reason.
Let’s put things into perspective…Coal plants in America only account for half of one percent of all the mercury in the air, emitting about 41-48 tons of mercury every year. By comparison, forest fires emit 44 tons per year. China emits 400 tons of mercury every year. And God is the worst culprit of all, emitting 9-10,000 tons by way of volcanoes and geysers. So who sues God?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 29, 2012
Title: Eric Holder. Voter ID. And the Truth.
Topic: Voter ID Laws
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Voter ID is
oppressive. Voter ID is against the law. Voter ID is
discriminatory. Voter ID hurts my feelings. All lame excuses by the left to
block Voter ID laws in America.
Justin Danhof joins us today for 2 quick segments on Eric Holder’s obsession
with Voter ID laws. Why is Holder so dead set against Voter ID laws and
protection from voter fraud? And just how is the Voter ID law supposed to work?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Voter ID Laws
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Department of Justice sat on
a request from the National Center for Public Policy Research for over 6 months
concerning Eric Holder’s reasons to challenge the Voter ID Laws. What was the
DOJ’s response? Did Eric Holder lie? Has the President lied?? You don’t want to
miss this segment with Justin Danhof!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 6, 2012
Title: The Decline AND Fall of Medicare While Politicians Kick-the-Can!
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Is there a Medicare Trust Fund where my contributions go and which someday will pay for my healthcare costs when I get old? Where is the money in the Medicare fund going?
Democrats have demonized conservatives during this election cycle. Did Obamacare remove over $700 billion - $517 billion from Medicare Part A and $247 billion from Medicare Part B to pay for healthcare for younger Americans? While both Republicans and Democrats do nothing to fix Medicare, what are physicians saying - the doctors who use it or who refuse to use it?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by Dr. Elaina George
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Is Obamacare the Trojan horse that will place all Americans under the boot of a federally controlled single-payer system?
- Will seniors be able to keep their current physician under Obamacare?
- Will the quality of care improve under Obamacare?
- Will patients and their families still make “end-of-life-decisions”?
With Obamacare, did the Democrats cram down our throats a more expensive system with centralized planning, where the good of the collective wins over the rights of individuals who are deemed too ignorant to make the right decisions about their own health care?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 23, 2012
Title: Slimy Green Anti-American Activities!
Topic: Energy and the Environment
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Would working
against the keystone pipeline, against oil and gas drilling, against fracking,
and against opening up a new mine in Alaska be classified as anti-American
activity?
What is Earthworks all about? Tell us more about Earthworks' funding! Has any
environmental group in America done scientific studies that show
A.) fracking pollutes ground water or
B.) Environmental damages that would be caused by laying down
the pipeline?
What is GroupSnoop all about? Tell our listeners about the Pebble Mine in Alaska
and how much is might be worth. What could the mine do for the U.S metal
reserves? Where are we getting our rare earth minerals right now?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 5, 2012
Title: Was it Lyndon’s fault or was it Paul’s fault? George or 50 Cent? --- The Blame Game
Topic: Blacks Believe Too Many Lies
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Did Lyndon Johnson create the myth of his great society, did his welfare state create the state that we are in today, or did Congressman Paul Ryan?
Did George Bush create the unemployment in the Black and the Latino community or was it because there is no father and the lyrics sung by musicians like 50 cent?
Did Phyllis Schlafly cause the genocide to occur in the black community? Or did Margaret Sanger, in her desire to limit the Negro race, create the genocide?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Blacks Believe Too Many Lies
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
When will Black America wake up?
WHO created the fatherlessness communities in the Black communities throughout America? Was it Lyndon Johnson? OR George Bush?
Who writes the curriculum standards? Has that worked?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 29, 2012
Title: How Can Problems Facing Primary Care Physicians in Medicare Harm Seniors?
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 3
What percentage of doctors are refusing to see Medicare patients and is the trend growing?
How can refusing to accept Medicare improve a doctor's ability to serve his senior citizen patients?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
How is Congress repeatedly making it harder for doctors to accept Medicare?
How does Medicare decide what to pay doctors?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3
Topic: Medicare
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
How do Medicare codes for dolphin bites - and "getting bitten by a dolphin in a subsequent encounter" - exemplify the needlessly complicated Medicare coding system which frustrates many doctors and drives up administrative costs?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 6, 2012
Title: The R.O.F Program: Reward Our Friends With Taxpayer Dollars.
Topic: The R.O.F Program
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Why is Government
Watchdog calling for Congressional oversight hearings to investigate illegal
federal lobbying grants?
Why is the Center for Disease control handing out hundreds of billions of
dollars in controversial grants?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: The R.O.F Program
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
What types of laws is this money
being used for to try to influence? If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck,
and looks like a duck, is it a duck?
What can we do to help the National Center for Public Policy Research pound on
the CDC to enforce upon their grant recipients not to break the law?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 1, 2012
Title: NEWSFLASH: THE BRENNAN CENTER, LEADING OPPONENT OF VOTER INTEGRITY, IS FINANCED BY GEORGE SOROS!
Topic: GroupSnoop
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
If you get sick, who
would you go to for a cure? A carpenter? A plumber? Or an expert
in the field of medicine? Why?
What are the chances of George Soros funding Terry Lowry and the conservative
What's UP radio program? Please explain to our listeners who George Soros is!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: GroupSnoop
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Is there evidence for voter
fraud in America? OR has there NEVER EVER been a recorded case of voter fraud?
Has voter fraud ever flipped an election one way or another? What do you and your group, found at www.groupsnoop.org have to say?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 17, 2012
Title: Is It Fair For Identity Thieves To Cancel Out Your Vote?
Topic: Voter ID
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Is it fair for voter ID thieves
to cancel out your vote before (or after) you go to the voting booth?
ARE voter ID thieves cancelling out legitimate voters? Can unregistered voters
also vote and cancel out the vote of legitimate voters?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Voter ID
Discussed by David Almasi
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
How do we have Harry Reid?
Explain ways that cheaters, that identity thieves, could go into Nevada and
garner nearly 428 votes?
What is voter suppression? What are "ghost votes"?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 20, 2012
Title: $26 Million gift for Environmental Radicals
Topic: Natural Gas vs. Coal
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
David Ridenour,
President of the National Center for Public Policy Research, recently accused
Aubrey McClendon, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, of trying to sabotage the coal
industry donating $26 million to the Sierra Club to fund a "Beyond Coal"
campaign.
Listen in as Mr. Ridenour further explains why this donation is so disconcerting
to some.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Natural Gas vs. Coal
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
David Ridenour continues his discussion on why the recent mega-million donation to the "Beyond Coal" campaign is confusing and troublesome to so many people, especially within the energy field. The donor, Aubrey McClendon, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, even bragged about how successful they had been in their efforts to close numerous coal-fired projects. Please do not tell the shareholders of Chesapeake Energy that other groups are now giving to the Sierra Club to lobby against natural gas companies to shut down all drilling and production of natural gas in America.
If the Sierra Club is successful, it will bankrupt Chesapeake Energy!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 26, 2012
Title: Bullies Abound EVERYWHERE - Even in Politics! Surprised
Topic: Voter ID
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Special guest Amy Ridenour answers:
Is life full of winners and losers? Are there bullies in politics? Is voter ID
racist?
What proof is there that shows that the other side gets their jollies by
attacking conservatives?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Voter ID
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
For our listeners who aren't yellow, what do they need to do, who do they need
to email to get involved?
Tell us more about what type of people and groups that you want to pull into the
thick of things!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 2, 2012
Title: EPA Regulations Expected to Further Cripple Coal Industry and to Unnecessarily Drive Electricity Costs Sky High! Surprised?
Topic: Energy Independence
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Coal currently provides what percentage of the nation's electricity? Is it true that the proposed regulation will ban future construction of new coal-fired power plants and force utilities to use other power sources? What would those other sources be?
Will the EPA’s greenhouse gas rule essentially end the use of coal as a power source in our country? Is President Obama bankrupting the coal industry through his regulatory black boot? (For our listeners, what does the regulatory boot mean?)
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Energy Independence
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Is Obama delivering on his promise to make electricity prices skyrocket? Will American coal be exported to China, thus putting our country at a competitive disadvantage for cheap power?
Does the new rule remove coal as a competitor for electricity, making way for Obama’s renewable alternatives, wind and solar? The new rule is a bail out for whom?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 10, 2012
Title: EPA’s Cross State Air rule: DENIED.
Topic: Obama Projects
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
What is the goal of
the EPA? What is the Clean Air Act?
Has the EPA usurped its authority and gone beyond the regulations found in the
Clean Air Act by imposing cross state rules?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Obama Projects
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
What would the
estimated cost be for the average family listening right now, should the EPA
have the authority and it be upheld by the appellate courts and the U.S. Supreme
Court to regulate cross state line smog and smut?
Are there any studies that show, without a doubt, that humans suffer serious
health problems because of the smog coming out of a coal fire generating plant?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 16, 2011
Title: Free Enterprise - Will You Have Enough Electricity?
Topic: Free Enterprise
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Will President Obama’s anti-coal agenda threaten the reliability of
electricity during the winter and the summer?
Are utilities and the electric grid operators warning the Feds that the EPA is shutting them down? Will America be in trouble if we do not reign in the EPA?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Free Enterprise
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Are the republicans and the conservatives listening to the cry of the
energy suppliers concerning the reliability of our electricity throughout America?
When will the American voter wake up and see that the environmentalists are destroying jobs in America? What is the UN meeting in
Durban, South Africa about?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 11, 2011
Title: Was it Lyndon’s fault or was it Paul’s fault? George or 50 Cent? --- The Blame Game
Topic: Blacks Believe Too Many Lies
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Did Lyndon Johnson create the myth of his great society, did his welfare state create the state that we are in today, or did Congressman Paul Ryan?
Did George Bush create the unemployment in the Black and the Latino community or was it because there is no father and the lyrics sung by musicians like 50 cent?
Did Phyllis Schlafly cause the genocide to occur in the black community? Or did Margaret Sanger, in her desire to limit the Negro race, create the genocide?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Blacks Believe Too Many Lies
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
When will Black America wake up?
WHO created the fatherlessness communities in the Black communities throughout America? Was it Lyndon Johnson? OR George Bush?
Who writes the curriculum standards? Has that worked?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 19, 2011
Title: GroupSnoop.org Launches to Provide Background Data on Nation’s Most Influential Public Policy Non-Profits.
Topic: GroupSnoop
Discussed by Justin Danhof
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
From Greenpeace to the Ford Foundation, non-profits often have unseen
influence in the day-to-day lives of average Americans.
“Non-profits influence everything from labor laws, to the price of electricity,
to the cars we drive and everything in between. GroupSnoop.org fills a void by
offering critical analysis and frank assessment” said our guest, Justin Danhof.
GroupSnoop.org launched with nearly two-dozen documented entries with many more
to follow in the coming weeks. Who funds the American Civil Liberties Union,
Greenpeace, MoveOn…
Log on to www.GroupSnoop.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 18, 2011
Title: Obama’s Jobs Panel Infested by Insiders Bug-ridden with Fleas.
Topic: Obamanomics
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Crony capitalism is not an economic plan, says Dr. Tom Borelli,
Director of the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise
Project.
General Electric has significant investments in solar panels and wind turbines
and for their CEO Jeff Immelt to recommend more government spending on clean
energy development is rather self-serving to many Washington watchers.
In addition to Immelt, other members of Obama’s jobs panel can profit from its
recommendation on clean energy. This self-dealing is shocking and members of
Congress need to unplug the panel members from their positions.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 27, 2011
Title: The Train Act: Is It Sometime Positive to Put Americans Back To Work?
Topic: Out of Control E.P.A.
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Congress recently passed the TRAIN ACT – the Transparency in Regulatory Analysis
of Impacts on the Nation Act of 2011. What will it do?
The House may have passed the TRAIN ACT, but will it pass the Senate?
More importantly, will Obama veto the TRAIN ACT?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 13, 2011
Title: More of the Same With Hopes for Different Results
Topic: Obamanomics
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Houston
Chronicle recently opined that Obama’s New Job’s Bill would create 141,500 new
jobs in Texas. Let’s look at the numbers.
1. 64,100 construction jobs…Obama recently remarked that the first round of
shovel-ready jobs was not very shovel ready. These are not permanent full-time
jobs, though.
2. 39,500 teaching positions. Again – these are not permanent full-time
positions.
3. 37,900 opportunities for training at various vo-tech/junior colleges
Does the Chronicle really consider someone who is receiving training as
someone working full-time?
Obamanomics has not worked and pouring more money down the same rat-hole is not
going to put America back to work.
Send us your thoughts and comments.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 26, 2011
Title: Obama Should Wave The White Flag And Surrender In His War Against Fossil Fuels
Topic: Electricity: Reliable and Affordable
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
“In the wake of our current economic crisis, President Obama must surrender
his war on fossil fuels by calling off the EPA’s harassment of the industry,”
states Tom Borelli, Ph.D., Director of the National Center’s Free Enterprise
Project.
Mr. Borelli continues, “In addition to harming today’s economy, the actions
taken by the EPA will reduce our competitiveness and our national security.”
Are American families ready for more layoffs, higher electric bills and the
real threat of brown-outs and black-outs for no real benefit in their health? We
must all tell our elected officials, "Send EPA bureaucrats home NOT more American
workers!"
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: President Obama Escalates His War on Fossil Fuels
Topic: Electricity: Reliable and Affordable
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2 of a Best of
Interview
Prior to his
election in 2008, did Candidate Obama state what he would do to the price of
electricity across America? Did Americans listen?
With many families already struggling to just make ends meet, it’s shocking that
Obama is advancing regulations that will add additional financial burdens to
strained budgets of hardworking Americans.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 of a Best of Interview
Topic: Electricity: Reliable and Affordable
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Obama’s war on fossil fuels is a
war against hardworking American families. It’s tragic that the president is
siding with the desires of the social and environmental elite over the needs of
American families who can least afford to pay higher energy prices.
Ironically, the Americans who are hurt the most by rising energy prices are the
poor and those on fixed-incomes. Obama is responsible for waging environmental
class warfare against low and fixed-income families while his fellow elites
remain unaffected.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 18, 2011
Title: Why Are Flash Mobs Roaming Parts of America?
Topic: Hate Crimes
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Flash mobs are
continuing around America? Where do we go from here?
Was the Mayor of Philadelphia correct in addressing how many young black youth’s
dress, how they are covered with tattoos, and how the keep themselves and then
wonder why no one will hire them?
But where do we go from here as a county? If the youth are not being taught at
home, where will they learn character traits and work ethic? How do we teach
youth, as well as adults, self control? Is it as simple as the golden rule?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 12, 2011
Title: Are the Flash Mobs Roaming Parts of America Home Grown Terrorists Attacks?
Topic: Hate Crimes
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1
If it walks like a duck, and looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, most
likely it is a duck. Likewise, are many of the outbursts of rebellion
exemplified in the Flash Mob attacks in many parts of America, racially
motivated?
Should many of the crimes being committed by the individuals participating in
the Flash Mob attacks be called “hate crimes”?
Can blacks be guilty of ‘Hate Crimes” against whites or is it only a one way
street?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3
Topic: Hate Crimes
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Was the recent
rampage at the Wisconsin State Fair a clear example of “hate crimes” committed
by black teenagers on white victims?
Do I, as an Anglo, have the moral authority to call the rampage an example of
“hate crimes”?
Can blacks be guilty of ‘Hate Crimes” against whites or is it only a one way
street?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3
Topic: Hate Crimes
Discussed by Jerome Hudson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Black youths
targeting white victims in Wisconsin: should it be called “Hate Crimes”?
What is contributing to the mentality of the youth in America, white, black, and
/ or brown, that they can just join in a group, as a Flash Mob, and attack
innocent victims?
Is it too late to teach the youth in America to be civil?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 27, 2011
Title: Will the Consumer Be the Loser When It Comes To Genetically Engineered Salmon?
Topic: Food and Drug Administration
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Several members of Congress are attempting to pressure the F.D.A.’s
decision concerning genetically engineered salmon. Sounds fishy to me!
Members of Congress want to prohibit the FDA from approving the sale of
genetically engineered fish, fish that the FDA has found to be safe after
exhaustive studies. So where’s the beef? Hint: big businesses do not want the
competition.
But how does the FDA work? Listen in now.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Food and Drug Administration
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
If big business benefits from barriers to entry by innovators, everyone else
loses, especially the consumer.
Too often big business lobbies for burdensome and unnecessary regulations which
serve only to protect themselves from competition.
When it comes to driving down the price for Salmon, big business is lobbying
their friends in Congress against the FDA approval, thus protecting their own
profits.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 18, 2011
Title: Who Should Decide What Commercials Your Kids Watch on TV?
Topic: Food Police
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Is there an obesity problem in
America? Are too many kids overweight? Should the solution be: Food Police?
Jeff Stier joins us again discussing commercials aimed at kids encouraging them
to eat food products, that if eaten in moderation are OK but when eaten to the
extreme, they may cause weight problems.
Children see too many commercials that use sex to sell. Children are exposed to
too much violence on TV, but do we need the ‘nanny state activists’ to begin to
dictate everything? When is too much too much? Are parents now ready to turn
over the TV turner to some nanny activist? What should be the government’s role
in censoring TV commercials?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 14, 2011
Title: President Obama Escalates His War on Fossil Fuels
Topic: Electricity: Reliable and Affordable
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
Prior to his election in 2008,
did Candidate Obama state what he would do to the price of electricity across
America? Did Americans listen?
With many families already struggling to just make ends meet, it’s shocking that
Obama is advancing regulations that will add additional financial burdens to
strained budgets of hardworking Americans.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Electricity: Reliable and Affordable
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Obama’s war on fossil fuels is a
war against hardworking American families. It’s tragic that the president is
siding with the desires of the social and environmental elite over the needs of
American families who can least afford to pay higher energy prices.
Ironically, the Americans who are hurt the most by rising energy prices are the
poor and those on fixed-incomes. Obama is responsible for waging environmental
class warfare against low and fixed-income families while his fellow elites
remain unaffected.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 16, 2011
Title: Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers Challenged Over His Support of President Obama’s War on Fossil Fuels
Topic: Obama's War on Fossil Fuels
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Obama desires to skyrocket the price of electricity and Obama’s
administration sees nothing wrong with $8 per gallon of gasoline. The social and
political elitists will NOT be hurt with skyrocketing increases in energy costs
but what about you? Why should a major corporation like Duke Energy lobby for
Cap and Trade and why should Duke Energy provide the Democratic Convention a $10
million dollar line of credit? Are they buying political favors? For more on
this issue and to find Tom Borelli, log onto
www.NationalCenter.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 18, 2011
Title: No Soda in Municipal Buildings in Boston. No Homemade Lunches for School Kids in Chicago. The Food Police are now after Chocolate Milk. What’s next?
Topic: Food Police
Discussed by Jeff Stier
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Food Police go after more free choices made by American citizens every day. The Mayor of Boston attacks the sale of soda in municipal buildings. Schools outside Chicago don’t trust mommies to pack the right lunch, so the ban homemade lunches. Where are the Food Police attaching Chocolate Milk? What will be next? Do the Food Police know best? Jeff Stier, Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research takes aim at the Food Policy. Send us your thoughts by using our contact link above. More information can be found at www.NationalCenter.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 30, 2010
Title: NATIONAL POLL OF CONSERVATIVE VOTERS FINDS BIG BUSINESS SHOULD FEAR TEA PARTY ACTIVISTS
Topic: Tea Party Activists To Become Economic Activists
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Several CEO’s with major
corporations backed OBAMA’s healthcare and Cap and Trade legislation. Will
Tea Party Activists become selective with their purchases and punish the
progressive CEO’s by shopping elsewhere. Why focus on General Electric and
Johnson and Johnson, though?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 25, 2010
Title: EEOC Warns Employers: If You Don't Want to Hire Felons, You Need a Good Reason. Yep – Hire Felons or Go To Jail! Part 1 of 2
Topic: Hire Felons or Go To Jail
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is warning employers that it is illegal to use a prospective employee's past conviction records, even for serious felonies, as an "absolute measure" as to whether they should be hired because this "could limit the employment opportunities of some protected groups." Yes folks, some EEOC bureaucrat in an obscure cubicle protected by mountains of paper work feels felons are being discriminated against, unjustly I might add, by some bigoted employer or HR person and now wants felons to be equally represented in the work place.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: EEOC Warns Employers: If You Don't Want to Hire Felons, You Need a Good Reason. Yep – Hire Felons or Go To Jail! Part 2 of 2
Topic: Hire Felons or Go To Jail
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is warning
employers that it is illegal to use a prospective employee's past conviction
records, even for serious felonies, as an "absolute measure" as to whether they
should be hired because this "could limit the employment opportunities of some
protected groups."
This is, the EEOC says, because blacks and Hispanics are over-represented among
felons.
"Blacks and Hispanics also have an unfortunate higher high school and college
dropout rates than whites and Asians -- surely this could be determined to be a
disparate impact. Does that mean the EEOC could mandate that employers cannot
consider an applicant's education? Where will it stop?" asks Justin Danhof,
general counsel of the National Center for Public Policy Research. "It is
unfortunate that the EEOC is placing outdated racial politics ahead of the
American workforce at a time when employers should be encouraged to hire, but
this mentality will likely make businesses think twice about plans for
expansion. Employers should be free to consider the full content of an
applicant's character when making hiring decisions."
"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination
on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin," said Amy
Ridenour, president of the National Center for Public Policy Research. "It does
not ban discrimination based on character. Furthermore, it's odd that an agency
charged with stopping racism and sexism in hiring has adopted a policy that will
help more white males than members of any other group."
"The EEOC should not be trying to micromanage private hiring decisions beyond
the authority given to it by Congress," added Ridenour, "which this wrongheaded
policy surely does. And pity the poor employer, fearful on the one hand of being
charged with racism if he does not hire a felon -- white though that felon might
be -- but fearful on the other of being sued by his other employees, should that
felon commit a crime at the workplace that harms them. Certainly employers
should be permitted to hire felons; even applauded when appropriate, but they
should not be made to feel they could be asked to defend themselves in court if
they do not."
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 16, 2010
Title: NAACP RESOLUTION CALLS ON TEA PARTY TO REPUDIATE RACIST ELEMENTS IN MOVEMENT
Topic: Tea Party Racism
Discussed by R. Dozier Gray
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Tea Party is racist. So why are so many minorities are members? Yeah that makes sense…. Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 26, 2010
Title: IT’S UNPATRIOTIC TO BE OLD, BROKE, AND SICK
Topic: Obamacare
Discussed by Matt Patterson
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
More and more doctors are saying “No thanks” to seniors who need a new physician. It’s just not worth it. Is Obama Care going to help or hinder your mom or dad? Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more details.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 9, 2010
Title: IPCC EMPLOYEES SHOULD ROT IN JAIL!
Topic: Cap and Trade Bill In Congress
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Will the Obama Administration shut down the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)? Probably not. But one can dream, right? Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this issue.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 28, 2010
Title: IPCC EMPLOYEES SHOULD ROT IN JAIL!
Topic: Cap and Trade Bill In Congress
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Will the Obama Administration shut down the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)? Probably not. But one can dream, right? Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more on this issue.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 11, 2010
Title: SPYING ON ICEBERGS INSTEAD OF TERRORISTS
Topic: Stupid Government Spending
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Obama Administration has diverted some our nation’s intelligence assets to environmental scientists researching global warming! So, Mr. President, are you saying that a very slowly melting iceberg is more important than a terrorist blowing up, say, the WHITE HOUSE? Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 2, 2009
Title: PAYBACK: VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET
Topic: Vote With Your Wallet
Discussed by Tom Borelli
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Which companies have decided to profit from Cap and Trade? Should we boycott them? Some of the companies include: Starbucks, Levi Strauss, Nike, GE, Shell, Johnson & Johnson. Log on to www.NationalCenter.org for more information.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 3, 2008
Title: PICKENS PLAN REQUIRES MORE DIGGING
Topic: Energy and the Environment
Discussed by Amy Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
What would drilling in America cost taxpayers? Is it really worth it? Would the Pickens Plan have a lasting impact on America for decades to come? Amy Ridenour is the President of the National Center for Public Policy Research. Log onto www.nationalcenter.org for more information.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 29, 2008
Title: More Global Cooling Ahead, Study Says
Topic: Global Cooling
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Dr. Bonner Cohen, Senior Fellow at the national Center for Public Policy Research in WDC – www.NationalCenter.org, presents compelling facts on the “Global Cooling” now taking place, and has been for nearly 10 years. What are the facts, contributing factors, and what we must do to counter M.S.M? (What lies are your children being feed in public schools?)
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Causes of Climate Change
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Dr. Bonner Cohen continues discussing the causes of Climate Change. Every public school study needs to hear this – as well as many of your friends.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: The Sun, The Oceans and Volcanoes
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Ocean currents, solar activity, and volcanic activity – above and below the oceans cause air temperatures to rise and fall on a global scale. Dr. Bonner Cohen, Senior Fellow at the national Center for Public Policy Research in WDC – www.NationalCenter.org, presents compelling facts on the “Global Cooling” now taking place, and has been for nearly 10 years.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Natural Variations Cause Cooling Global Temperatures
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by Dr. Bonner R. Cohen
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Dr. Bonner Cohen, Senior Fellow at the national Center for Public Policy Research in WDC – www.NationalCenter.org, presents the facts of “Natural Variations Cause Cooling Global Temperatures”.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 18, 2006
Title: FREE HEALTH CARE IS A FATAL NOTION Segment 1 of 2
Topic: Health Care
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Pros and Cons of a National Health Care System. What would result from nationalizing health care in the U.S.? Less service and more death! Is that what you want for your children and grandchildren?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: FREE HEALTH CARE IS A FATAL NOTION Segment 2 of 2
Topic: Depression
Discussed by David Hogberg
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
The Pros and Cons of a National Health Care System. What would result from nationalizing health care in the U.S.? Less service and more death! Is that what you want for your children and grandchildren?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization