Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
January 11, 2021
Title: What’s Next for America?
Topic: America Divided
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
With only days remaining in his Presidency, many are again calling for President Trump’s removal from office. What happens next?
David Ridenour is the President of the National Center for Public Policy Research.
For more on this topic, click
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Will the Trump-haters go away once he is no longer President? Or will they hound him through all eternity?
Did President Trump egg on and encourage the law-breakers last Wednesday?
The Left completely ignored the violent riots and protest for seven months. Are they now saying the attack last Wednesday is terrorism, calling for the most severe punishment possible?
Is it customary for Cabinet Secretaries and other appointed officials to resign before the next President officially takes office?
Have President Trump’s policies helped more Americans than they have harmed?
Will a free America survive the next two years?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 30, 2013
Title: Should they be Shuttered for Being so Way off Target?
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In 2002, commenting on the possibility that Iraq had supplied or might supply
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to terrorists, Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary
of Defense, famously said: "...there are known knowns... There are known
unknowns... But there are also unknown unknowns - there are things we do not
know we don't know."
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been wrong seven of the past 10 years. Their credibility should be in the tanks.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Now the public has learned we
are in the midst of a 17-year “pause” in global warming that not one of the 73
climate models us by the U.N. predicted.
Count them: 73… all W.R.O.N.G.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been wrong 7 of the past
10 years. Being wrong so frequently poses a more significant risk to NOAA than
just a little embarrassment. It threatens to undermine the agency's credibility,
undermine the public's faith in even its short-range forecasts, and ultimately
place lives at risk.
We are NOT in a global warming period. Period. The Global Warming Alarmists should have no credibility, zero, zilch, nada…none.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 6, 2013
Title: Should they be Shuttered for Being so Way off Target?
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
In 2002, commenting on the possibility that Iraq had supplied or might supply
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to terrorists, Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary
of Defense, famously said: "...there are known knowns... There are known
unknowns... But there are also unknown unknowns - there are things we do not
know we don't know."
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been wrong seven of the past 10 years. Their credibility should be in the tanks.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Climate Change
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Now the public has learned we
are in the midst of a 17-year “pause” in global warming that not one of the 73
climate models us by the U.N. predicted.
Count them: 73… all W.R.O.N.G.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has been wrong 7 of the past
10 years. Being wrong so frequently poses a more significant risk to NOAA than
just a little embarrassment. It threatens to undermine the agency's credibility,
undermine the public's faith in even its short-range forecasts, and ultimately
place lives at risk.
We are NOT in a global warming period. Period. The Global Warming Alarmists should have no credibility, zero, zilch, nada…none.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 20, 2012
Title: $26 Million gift for Environmental Radicals
Topic: Natural Gas vs. Coal
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
David Ridenour,
President of the National Center for Public Policy Research, recently accused
Aubrey McClendon, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, of trying to sabotage the coal
industry donating $26 million to the Sierra Club to fund a "Beyond Coal"
campaign.
Listen in as Mr. Ridenour further explains why this donation is so disconcerting
to some.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Natural Gas vs. Coal
Discussed by David Ridenour
with National Center for Public Policy Research (www.NationalCenter.org)
David Ridenour continues his discussion on why the recent mega-million donation to the "Beyond Coal" campaign is confusing and troublesome to so many people, especially within the energy field. The donor, Aubrey McClendon, the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, even bragged about how successful they had been in their efforts to close numerous coal-fired projects. Please do not tell the shareholders of Chesapeake Energy that other groups are now giving to the Sierra Club to lobby against natural gas companies to shut down all drilling and production of natural gas in America.
If the Sierra Club is successful, it will bankrupt Chesapeake Energy!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization