Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
June 18, 2024
Title: Justice Alito on Secret Recording
Topic: Supreme Court Justices
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Does America need to turn back to God? Justice Alito believes we do!
Michael J. O’Neill is the Vice President of Legal Affairs at the Landmark Legal
Foundation. Michael agrees with Justice Alito and discusses why the Left is
up-in-arms about Alito’s “extremist views”.
Click here to learn more about the
Landmark Legal
Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Were secret recordings made during a Supreme Court Historical Society dinner
that Democrats are using to castigate Supreme Court Alito and others? Michael
O’Neill shares details about the exchange between a liberal film-maker posing as
Conservative and Justice Alito.
Supreme Court Justices are allowed to have firmly held convictions and beliefs.
Is the Left accusing Justice Alito of having a secret agenda and legislating
from the bench? Michael O’Neill explains the difference between having an
opinion and following the rule of law, citing one recent case regarding the
over-the-counter abortion pill.
Does the Left desperately want to take over control of the US Supreme Court? Are
they doing everything in their power to dismantle and rebuild it?
Click here to help support the Landmark Legal Foundation.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 7, 2024
Title: BREAKING NEWS: US Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Trump Stays on Ballot
Topic: Supreme Court Decisions
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Michael J. O’Neill is the Vice President of Legal Affairs at the
Landmark Legal Foundation. Today, Michael discusses the recent unanimous SCOTUS ruling concerning President Trump’s inclusion on the Colorado ballot.
Click
here to read a full explanation on the US Supreme Court ruling.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is a “per curiam opinion”?
Is it rare for all nine US Supreme Court Justices to unanimously agree?
Why did the US Supreme Court strike down the Colorado Supreme Court ruling?
Is this the end of Trump’s battle to appear on every state ballot should he be the 2024 Republican Presidential nominee?
Click here to help support the
Landmark Legal Foundation.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 28, 2023
Title: Weak College Administrators Embolden Antisemites
Topic: Woke Progressives
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Why is the hatred toward Jewish students being tolerated on campuses across the country?
Michael J. O’Neill is the Vice President of Legal Affairs at the Landmark Legal Foundation. Today, he discusses the increasing violence against Jewish students on college and university campuses across the nation.
Click
here to read Michael J. O’Neill’s op-ed on this important topic.
Click here for the latest from the
Landmark Legal Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Many of the perpetrators of violence on Jewish students are foreign nationals in the US on student visas. Should those individuals be subject to visa revocation and deportation?
Jewish students have been intimidated, bullied, harassed, and even assaulted. When does free speech cross the line?
Should colleges and universities use every tool at their disposal to punish perpetrators?
Can foreign students demand the right to stay in America and attend classes even though they should, in fact, be deported for their crimes?
Click
here to help support the
Landmark Legal Foundation.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
September 15, 2023
Title: Will Biden be Impeached?
Topic: Impeachment
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Michael O’Neill serves as Vice President of Legal Affairs at the
Landmark Legal Foundation. Today, he discusses the recent inquiry into impeachment of Joe Biden and why it is necessary for the public to know the truth.
Click here for the latest from the Landmark Legal Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is a “formal impeachment inquiry”? Is this just “tit-for-tat” or is there actual evidence against Joe Biden? Michael explains the process and why it’s so important to follow through with all the necessary information.
Is there compelling public need to have information on Joe Biden and his son’s business dealings?
David Weis was recently appointed Special Counsel to oversee an investigation into Hunter Biden. Is this appointment enough to further the impeachment?
Are Americans sick and tired of endless investigations?
Where will this formal impeachment inquiry lead? In short, Michael says: “Follow the money.”
Is Biden obligated to honestly answer questions from the media about his son’s business dealings?
Click
here to help support the
Landmark Legal Foundation.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 18, 2023
Title: Common Sense Wins in SCOTUS
Topic: Supreme Court Decisions
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Michael J. O’Neill is Assistant General Counsel at the Landmark
Legal Foundation. Today, Michael discusses some recent SCOTUS decisions and
what he predicts will happen in the coming months.
Click here for the latest from the
Landmark Legal Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does common sense suggest that Joe Biden doesn’t have the power to unilaterally forgive $450 billion of student loan debt without at least some authority from Congress?
Does common sense suggest that states like Colorado cannot enforce a law compelling an individual to write website copy that she disagrees with?
Does common sense suggest that colleges and universities cannot discriminate based on race?
Do most Americans agree with these three recent rulings by SCOTUS?
Did Joe Biden make promises he knew he could not keep to buy votes? Did he even admit that he didn’t have the power?
Did Justice Amy Coney Barret repeatedly us the term “common sense” in any of her concurrences to the recent Supreme Court decisions?
In what other areas should the US Supreme Court invoke common sense? Michael discusses wealth taxes and why all Americans need to pay attention in the coming months.
Click
here to help support the
Landmark Legal Foundation as they preserve America’s founding principles.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 21, 2022
Title: Concerned Parents Labeled Domestic Terrorists
Topic: Parental Rights
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Back in 2021,
parents across the country began attending school board meetings, speaking their
minds about mask and vaccine mandates, as well as the perverse curriculum their
children were being taught. The Federal Government then labeled these concerned
parents “domestic terrorists”.
Today, Michael O’Neill, who serves as Assistant General Counsel at the Landmark Legal Foundation, discusses the truth found in the records they have received about these outrageous allegations.
Click here for the latest from
Landmark Legal.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why are parents so upset? Are they really “domestic terrorists”? Michael discusses the parents’ concerns, as well as the
National School Boards Association’s complaint against the parents and Attorney General Garland’s investigation.
Why did Landmark Legal file a request for the records under the Freedom of Information Act?
What documents has the Department of Justice released to Landmark Legal? Michael discusses the significance of the information found in these documents and reveals some very startling information!
Was the Biden Administration, through the Department of Justice, trying to intimidate parents into silence?
Where do we go from here? Click
here to help
Landmark Legal as they fight for the rights of Americans.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 7, 2022
Title: Upcoming Cases Before the US Supreme Court
Topic: Supreme Court Decisions
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Part 1 of 3
Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this
interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and
other legal issues.
Michael J. O’Neill is the Assistant General Counsel at Landmark Legal
Foundation. Today, Michael discusses some of the upcoming cases before the US
Supreme Court.
Click here for the
latest posts from Landmark Legal Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is Affirmative Action responsible for too many blacks and not enough Asians on
college campuses across the nation? Michael discusses what led to Affirmative
Action and just exactly what has been happening since.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - Upcoming Cases Before the US Supreme Court
Topic: Supreme Court Decisions
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this
interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and
other legal issues.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Who has the authority concerning voting laws: State Legislatures or Courts?
Michael explains that there are two election law cases before SCOTUS; he
discusses the case Moore
vs Harper, which will determine whether judges or legislatures are
vested with the authority to institute voter protection laws.
Are LGBTQ activists still trying to force businesses to go against their
Biblical and moral beliefs? Is this just “same song, different verse”
like the baker in Colorado?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - Upcoming Cases Before the US Supreme Court
Topic: Supreme Court Decisions
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this
interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and
other legal issues.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Under the Obama Administration, the EPA was granted the authority to regulate
every single body of water in the US – even a puddle on your own private
property! What is the status of this case in the US Supreme Court? Michael
explains “Waters of the United States”, who is affected, and how soon
the decision could be announced.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 17, 2022
Title: Landmark Legal Pushes Back Against the EPA
Topic: EPA Rules and Regulations
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Is the EPA more powerful than Congress? Is the EPA working to cripple our energy independence?
Michael J. O’Neill is the Assistant General Counsel at Landmark Legal Foundation. Today he discusses why their organization is pushing back against the EPA’s war on energy independence.
Click
here to read more on this topic from
Landmark Legal Foundation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Are unelected bureaucrats at the EPA wanting to fundamentally change how electricity is produced in America?
Michael explains that on February 28, 2022, the court heard oral arguments in
West Virginia v. EPA. This case will determine whether the EPA can issue a rule that would transform how our nation generates electricity under the thinnest of legal pretenses.
He goes on to reveal that pre-inflation and pre-Russia/Ukraine conflict, the wholesale electricity price was estimated to rise over $200 billion, with some states seeing an increase in prices exceeding 25%. CAN YOU AFFORD THIS?
Why doesn’t Congress step in and mandate the draconian rules themselves?
Is the liberal, anti-fossil-fuels crowd succeeding through the lower courts? Is there hope that the Supreme Court will rule against the bureaucrats at the EPA?
How can Congress clean house at the EPA and other governmental agencies? In response, Michael basically says that elections matter. He also explains that the EPA was never meant to regulate green house gas emissions.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 16, 2021
Title: Biden Admin Releases Attack Dogs on Mama Bears
Topic: Mama Bears
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
The US Attorney general, Merrick Garland, directed the FBI and
United States Attorneys to develop strategies for addressing threats from Mama
Bears and others. He has stated that Mama Bears are “threatening”
school administrators, board members, teachers and/or staff by “questioning”
school curriculum.
Michael O’Neill is the Assistant General Counsel at the Landmark Legal
Foundation. Today he discusses the lengths the Biden Administration is
willing to go to stop Mama Bears (and Papa Bears) from becoming “too
involved” with the education of their children.
Click here
for the latest information from Landmark Legal.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why is the DOJ going after Mama Bears? Michael explains that the National
School Board Association began the witch-hunt, urging the DOJ to
investigate concerned parents. They have since removed themselves from the
investigation! Michael goes on to discuss the secret meetings taking place…
What is the Freedom of Information Act?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Biden Admin Releases Attack Dogs on Mama Bears
Topic: Mama Bears
Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Have parents really displayed behavior mimicking a “domestic terrorist”
at school board meetings? SHORT ANSWER: No.
What issues are parents enraged over?
What records is the Landmark Legal Foundation seeking from the DOJ?
Have they received a reply from the DOJ concerning the records?
What information will these records reveals?
Did the DOJ mislead Congress concerning their investigation of “Mama Bears”?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 4, 2021
Title: Concerned Parents are Now Considered Domestic Terrorists
Topic: Public Education
Discussed by Pete Hutchison
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and other legal issues.
Benjamin Franklin wrote: “It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.”
Concerned parents addressing school boards with questions about COVID protocols, curriculum, and other issues and are now being branded “domestic terrorists”. However, through intimidation tactics and fear of arrest, incarceration, and sky-high legal bills, will parents quickly surrender their children to the state?
Pete Hutchison is the President of Landmark Legal Foundation. Pete has been in the trenches fighting for our freedoms the last quarter century. Today he discusses:
Should parents who speak out be investigated by the FBI as domestic terrorists?
Click
here to read more on this subject.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does the Federal government have jurisdiction over local school boards? Pete says: “This is the single most outrageous governmental edict I have ever seen… We are not going to lie down. We are going to fight this thing.”
What is “gaslighting”? Is it a Marxist approach? Is the Biden Administration gaslighting the opposition (AKA PARENTS)?
Do the majority of teachers and teacher’s union support the Biden Administration’s policies?
What has been the silver lining of the pandemic concerning public education?
Do more people need to get more involved in local government?
Have we lost the rule of law in America? Without equal justice under the law, is our Freedom lost? Pete says: “The court is standing between us and the Leftist agenda. We have to support them, because the rule of law does matter.”
Why is the Biden Administration attacking concerned parents? Pete reveals what the National School Board Association wants the Biden Administration to do. This is some crazy stuff! Listen close. He says: “It is a threat to the very fabric of our society.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 11, 2021
Title: Concerned Parents are Now Considered Domestic Terrorists
Topic: Public Education
Discussed by Pete Hutchison
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and other legal issues.
Benjamin Franklin wrote: “It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.”
Concerned parents addressing school boards with questions about COVID protocols, curriculum, and other issues and are now being branded “domestic terrorists”. However, through intimidation tactics and fear of arrest, incarceration, and sky-high legal bills, will parents quickly surrender their children to the state?
Pete Hutchison is the President of Landmark Legal Foundation. Pete has been in the trenches fighting for our freedoms the last quarter century. Today he discusses:
Should parents who speak out be investigated by the FBI as domestic terrorists?
Click
here to read more on this subject.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does the Federal government have jurisdiction over local school boards? Pete says: “This is the single most outrageous governmental edict I have ever seen… We are not going to lie down. We are going to fight this thing.”
What is “gaslighting”? Is it a Marxist approach? Is the Biden Administration gaslighting the opposition (AKA PARENTS)?
Do the majority of teachers and teacher’s union support the Biden Administration’s policies?
What has been the silver lining of the pandemic concerning public education?
Do more people need to get more involved in local government?
Have we lost the rule of law in America? Without equal justice under the law, is our Freedom lost? Pete says: “The court is standing between us and the Leftist agenda. We have to support them, because the rule of law does matter.”
Why is the Biden Administration attacking concerned parents? Pete reveals what the National School Board Association wants the Biden Administration to do. This is some crazy stuff! Listen close. He says: “It is a threat to the very fabric of our society.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 16, 2021
Title: Catch and Release Isn’t Working
Topic: Border Security
Discussed by Pete Hutchison
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
President Ronald Reagan once said “A nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.” Something positive must be done to control our border. Is Biden up to the task?
Pete Hutchison is the President of the Landmark Legal Foundation – The Ronald Reagan Legal Center. Today, he discusses the ever-growing problem of illegal immigration in America.
Click here for recent posts from Landmark Legal on a range of issue effecting our nation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Should Americans just sit back and let the UN control our lives as citizens of the One World Government?
Are people breaking into China – Russia – Cuba – Venezuela – willing to be controlled by their government? Pete points out that Canada isn’t allowing people into their country and they aren’t being accused of being racist!
What is the current US immigration policy?
Are parents of healthy, legal American children going to be upset if and when illegal immigrant children are in their schools, spreading COVID to the masses?
Are those on the Left ignoring the devastating public health and safety threats we face because of the open Southern border? Pete discusses some of the solutions we should implement immediately to secure our border to protect the health and safety of legal American citizens…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 30, 2021
Title: Justice Department Sues Georgia Over New Election Law
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Pete Hutchison
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
The Justice Department is stubbornly and recklessly determined to usurp the authority of States to exercise their Constitutional authority to supervise elections.
Pete Hutchison is the President of Landmark Legal Foundation. Pete has fought in the trenches for more than thirty years to defend the people’s rights. Today, he discusses why the Justice Department has sued the state of Georgia over their new election/voting laws and why we must not allow them (the JD) to succeed.
Click here for more on this and other issues facing our great nation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Would the new Georgia law in anyway disenfranchise black voters?
Do liberal Democrats call any attempt to remove dead people from voting rolls “voter suppression”?
Do liberal Democrats call any attempt to require photo ID when voting “voter suppression”?
Has the Justice Department vowed to sue any state that enacts voter integrity legislation?
Is the new Georgia law racist? Pete says that this claim is absolutely outrageous.
Should the US nationalize election laws and allow federal bureaucrats to run all elections?
HINT: Absolutely NOT! In fact, it is against the Constitution.
How can we ensure voter integrity? Pete says the answer is to elect good state and local leadership.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization