Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
March 29, 2022
Title: Harris County Elections are a Disgrace
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Stan Stanart
with Stanart for Harris County Clerk
Part 1 of 2
How did the current Harris County Elections Administrator lose 10,000 mail-in ballots? This is a disgrace!
Stan Start was the Harris County Clerk and Chief Election Official for eight years. He will be on the ballot once again this November as the Republican nomination. He wants to bring honest and fair elections back to Harris County.
Click here for more information about Stan’s campaign for Harris County Clerk.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is it “normal” to have 10,000 missing or misplaced mail-in ballots in an election? Stan explains when the ballots went missing and also expresses his concern for future elections if a Democrat is elected again to the Harris County Clerk’s office.
Did Stan ever misplace 10,000 mail-in ballots?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2Harris County Elections are - a Disgrace
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Stan Stanart
with Stanart for Harris County Clerk
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What stories about the recent election has Stan Stanart heard? Stan discusses
faulty equipment, late arrival of ballot machines, and other outrageous mishaps.
When and why did the Harris County Commissioner’s Court remove election
responsibilities from the County Clerk and appoint an Elections Administrator?
How can this ridiculous position be removed and the election responsibilities be
placed back into the hands of the County Clerk? Stan explains that it takes a
majority vote of the Commissioner’s Court and right now they do not have the
votes to reverse it. Maybe one day!
Do elections matter from the top of the ballot to the very bottom?
CClick here to donate to Stan
Stanart’s reelection campaign for Harris County Clerk.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 10, 2022
Title: Harris County Elections are a Disgrace
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Stan Stanart
with Stanart for Harris County Clerk
Part 1 of 2
How did the current Harris County Elections Administrator lose 10,000 mail-in ballots? This is a disgrace!
Stan Start was the Harris County Clerk and Chief Election Official for eight years. He will be on the ballot once again this November as the Republican nomination. He wants to bring honest and fair elections back to Harris County.
Click here for more information about Stan’s campaign for Harris County Clerk.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is it “normal” to have 10,000 missing or misplaced mail-in ballots in an election? Stan explains when the ballots went missing and also expresses his concern for future elections if a Democrat is elected again to the Harris County Clerk’s office.
Did Stan ever misplace 10,000 mail-in ballots?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2Harris County Elections are - a Disgrace
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Stan Stanart
with Stanart for Harris County Clerk
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What stories about the recent election has Stan Stanart heard? Stan discusses
faulty equipment, late arrival of ballot machines, and other outrageous mishaps.
When and why did the Harris County Commissioner’s Court remove election
responsibilities from the County Clerk and appoint an Elections Administrator?
How can this ridiculous position be removed and the election responsibilities be
placed back into the hands of the County Clerk? Stan explains that it takes a
majority vote of the Commissioner’s Court and right now they do not have the
votes to reverse it. Maybe one day!
Do elections matter from the top of the ballot to the very bottom?
CClick here to donate to Stan
Stanart’s reelection campaign for Harris County Clerk.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 6, 2021
Title: Beating the Woke Crowd on Election Integrity
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Scott Shepard
with Free Enterprise Project
(NationalCenter.org)
As the Election Integrity fight moves to Texas, some companies are
still standing against clean, fair, and open elections despite the embarrassing
result in Georgia.
Scott Shepard is a Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research
and Deputy Director of its Free Enterprise Project. Today he discusses
the Texas Election Integrity Laws and how we CAN win against the “woke crowd”.
Click
here for more on this issue from the National Center.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What lesson did big-business learn from attempting to boycott Georgia for its
Election Reform measures? Scott shares some personal experience he has from
attending annual shareholder meetings where big-business leaders attempt to
defend objections to the Georgia election reform law…
Why are so many corporate leaders against Voter-ID laws? Do they claim Voter-ID
laws are racist? Can they site examples?
Can we fight the “woke crowd” – and win? Scott says: “Yes BUT we
have to actively oppose these companies.” He explains that we have to use
the same tactics the Left uses…
Does the proposed Texas Election Integrity Law restrict eligible
voters’ access to the ballot?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 27, 2021
Title: Eight Myths about the Texas Election Integrity Bill
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by James Earl White
with James White for Texas (www.jameswhitefortexas.com/)
Part 1 of 3
East Texas Representative James Earl White is a candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner. A lifelong Conservative, James served in the US Army with the Berlin Brigade during the demise of the Soviet Union. Today, James discusses eight myths about the
Texas Election Integrity Bill (House Bill 3).
Click here for more information about James Earl White.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Myth #1: The Texas Election Integrity Bill limits voting times or excludes certain professions that do not adhere to a traditional work schedule from being able to vote.
Myth #2: The Texas Election Integrity Bill allows mail-in ballots with discrepancies to be automatically thrown out.
Myth #3: The Texas Election Integrity Bill limits drive-through voting for all people.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - Eight Myths about the Texas Election Integrity Bill
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by James Earl White
with James White for Texas (www.jameswhitefortexas.com/)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Myth #4: The Texas Election Integrity Bill places unreasonable
barriers in the way of Voting Assistants who help special populations vote.
Myth #5: The Texas Election Integrity Bill allows poll
watchers to practice voter intimidation and lessens restrictions on their
removal.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - Eight Myths about the Texas Election Integrity Bill
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by James Earl White
with James White for Texas (www.jameswhitefortexas.com/)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
NOTE: The State Representatives who have stayed in Autin are STILL working
hard for the citizens of Texas. James Earl White is one of those Reps who is
hard at work for you.
Myth #6: The Texas Election Integrity Bill forbids people
without a Driver’s License or a Social Security Number from voting.
Myth #7: The Texas Election Integrity Bill forbids people
without a Driver’s License or a Social Security Number from requesting a mail-in
ballot.
Myth #8: The Texas Election Integrity Bill limits the help a
voter may need comprehending and marking their ballot.
BOTTOM LINE: Does the Texas Election Integrity Bill (HB3)
make it easier to vote and harder to cheat? Is this why the Left are against it?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 21, 2021
Title: Easy to Vote. Hard to Cheat.
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Lindsey Curnutte
with Heritage Action for America (www.heritageaction.com)
Do you want fair, honest, open elections? OR do you want elections where it is easy to cheat and manipulate the outcome? This should be a no-brainer.
President Joe Biden claimed in a recent speech that election reform efforts are "the 21st Century Jim Crow assault" and "the most dangerous threat to voting and integrity of free and fair elections in our history."
Lindsey Curnutte is the Press Secretary at Heritage Action. Prior to this position, Lindsey contributed to the group’s digital efforts and worked for Congressman Ken Buck (R-CO) as his Communications Director.
Click here for more information about election reform and election integrity laws.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is discriminatory about requiring a potential voter to show a photo-ID?
What is discriminatory about requiring a voter identification number to be hand-written on an absentee ballot?
What is discriminatory about not allowing ballot harvesting? Lindsey explains what ballot harvesting is and how it compromises the integrity of elections.
Does Joe Biden deserve three Pinocchio’s for his comments on the Texas election reform effort?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 8, 2021
Title: HUGE Election Integrity Win at SCOTUS
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Horace Cooper
with Project 21 (www.NationalCenter.org)
In a recent 6-3 decision, the US Supreme Court ruled AGAINST ballot
harvesting and voting in person where you do NOT live. This is a
HUGE win for election integrity and reform!
Horace Cooper is a Senior Fellow with the National Center for Public Policy
Research. He is a frequent guest on the What’s UP Radio Program
and other radio and TV newscasts across the nation. Horace taught Constitutional
Law at George Mason University and was a Senior Counsel to US House
Majority Leader Dick Armey.
Click
here for more on this topic from Horace Cooper and Project 21.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is “ballot harvesting”?
In 2005, former President Jimmy Carter and Secretary of State James Baker
conducted a bipartisan report on ballot harvesting. What was their conclusion?
Was there a similar study done in 1976?
What was the exact decision by SCOTUS?
What is “out-of-precinct voting”? Why is the Left pushing this so
fiercely?
Many claim that both restricting ballot harvesting and out-of-precinct voting
are racist against minorities, specifically black people. Is this true? Or is
this enforcing voting integrity?
What were the Founding Fathers’ intentions for our election processes?
Horace closes the interview with this encouraging statement from SCOTUS:
“The Fifteenth Amendment and the Voting Rights Act don’t advantage or
disadvantage any political party because it doesn’t cover any political party.
It’s only intended to make sure that any race group isn’t unduly impacted. There
is no evidence that this happened in Arizona.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 30, 2021
Title: Justice Department Sues Georgia Over New Election Law
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Pete Hutchison
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)
The Justice Department is stubbornly and recklessly determined to usurp the authority of States to exercise their Constitutional authority to supervise elections.
Pete Hutchison is the President of Landmark Legal Foundation. Pete has fought in the trenches for more than thirty years to defend the people’s rights. Today, he discusses why the Justice Department has sued the state of Georgia over their new election/voting laws and why we must not allow them (the JD) to succeed.
Click here for more on this and other issues facing our great nation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Would the new Georgia law in anyway disenfranchise black voters?
Do liberal Democrats call any attempt to remove dead people from voting rolls “voter suppression”?
Do liberal Democrats call any attempt to require photo ID when voting “voter suppression”?
Has the Justice Department vowed to sue any state that enacts voter integrity legislation?
Is the new Georgia law racist? Pete says that this claim is absolutely outrageous.
Should the US nationalize election laws and allow federal bureaucrats to run all elections?
HINT: Absolutely NOT! In fact, it is against the Constitution.
How can we ensure voter integrity? Pete says the answer is to elect good state and local leadership.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 9, 2021
Title: Ballot Harvesting and Provisional Ballots
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Horace Cooper
with Project 21 (www.NationalCenter.org)
Part 1 of 2
There has been much debate about the legality of the 2020 Presidential Election.
Are they simply conspiracy claims? Or are there much deeper issues at hand that
have been present for many years?
Horace Cooper discusses ballot harvesting and provisional ballots today. He says
this: “Phony claims of voter suppression should never trump legitimate voter
integrity measures. All Americans - black, white or brown - benefit from
ensuring that authentic, duly-registered voters cast the ballots that decide
what policies and elected officials will govern their communities."
Find more on this topic from Horace Cooper
here.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is ballot harvesting?
Who have become the masters of ballot harvesting? Horace boldly states: “It is
the Progressives who…want policy outcomes that are overwhelming rejected.”
Instead of trying to stop ballot harvesting, why don’t Republicans emulate,
duplicate, and mimic the practice of ballot harvesting?
Is this issue now before the US Supreme Court? What is their claim? What happens
if the Supreme Court rules in favor of ballot harvesting?
Is there evidence that Arizona’s voting laws were passed to harm people of
color? HINT: Absolutely not!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Ballot Harvesting and Provisional Ballots
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Horace Cooper
with Project 21 (www.NationalCenter.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do states set the rules for who votes, when they vote, and how to count the
votes?
Horace makes this statement: “If you allow people to show up at various
precincts not where they live and still have their vote count you are going to
encourage fewer and fewer people to take one of the most solemn and important
responsibilities of self-government.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 11, 2021
Title: Who’s Counting?
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Hans von Spakovsky
with The Heritage Foundation (www.Heritage.org)
Part 1 of 3
Joseph Stalin said, "It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything."
Hans von Spakovsky is the co-author of “Who’s Counting? How Fraudsters and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk”.
Hans served as a commissioner on the Federal Election Commission from 2006 to 2007 and is also the former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Justice Department.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is there reason to mistrust the November Presidential election outcome?
Were rules governing the conduct of elections changed by various states shortly before the November elections?
Did private interest groups provide funds to local election authorities? Hans shares just how much money was given to a Left-wing advocacy group (a supposed non-profit organization).
What arguments did the Left used against the Right when we questioned their motives?
Can we restore Election Integrity going forward without implementing changes?
Does the US Constitution give each state the right to implement their own Election Laws?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - Who’s Counting?
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Hans von Spakovsky
with The Heritage Foundation (www.Heritage.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
In this segment, Hans mentions a great
website everyone needs to
check out for more Election reform information.
Hans says it is important to:
* Verify the accuracy of voter registration lists (Hans discusses the bogus
numbers)
* Verify citizenship of all voters
* Require voter ID
* Limit absentee ballots
* Prevent ballot harvesting
* Full Transparency: Allow election observers full and complete access to the
election process. Hans’ suggestion is fantastic! Listen in….
* Prohibit early vote counting
Are Republicans accused of suppressing minority voters when we question Election
Integrity?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - Who’s Counting?
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Hans von Spakovsky
with The Heritage Foundation (www.Heritage.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Should state governments reject same-day voter registration?
What is Automatic Voter Registration? Should this be rejected?
What are some Election Laws in Mexico?
Should private funding of election officials and government agencies be
rejected?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 29, 2021
Title: Democrats Want to “Fix” Our Elections
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Mary Beth Waddell
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Fresh off the heels of one of the most mistrusted election results
in our nation’s history, Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat-controlled House of
Representatives now want to pass a bill that would limit how your state runs its
elections.
Mary Beth Waddell believes that HR1, the deceptively named “For
the People Act,” would do immense damage to our freedom of speech, freedom
of association, and election integrity. Mary Beth is the Director of Federal
Affairs for Family and Religious Liberty at the FRC.
Click here for more from the FRC.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does the US Constitution grant states the right to run their own elections, for
local, state, Congressional and Presidential candidates?
When a piece of proposed legislation is given the number one spot, does this
signify its importance?
Is HR1, the “For the People Act”, the Democrats #1
priority?
What is a Banana Republic? Could HR1 push us there?
What does the Constitution say about this issue? Do Congressmen just don’t know
this – or do they not care?
Why do Democrats want Federal control over who registers to vote, when a vote is
cast, and who counts the votes?
How would HR1 restrict freedom of speech?
How could HR1 limit freedom of association? Mary Beth explains
how the bill would cause Conservatives to pause before donating to causes,
organizations, and even politicians.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 30, 2015
Title: Dead People and Illegals Vote, Too
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Christian Adams
with The American Civil Rights Union (www.theacru.org)
Do dead people really “vote”? If an illegal alien votes, does it count? Can,
and do, people cast multiple votes in the same election? Christian Adams, with
The American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) and Founder of the Election Law Center in
Virginia, says, “Yes, yes, and yes!” He mentions a woman who was running for
Congress who was registered to vote in several states – and voted in each!
But does it really matter? There can’t be “that” many people who try to dupe the
election officials. Right? “Wrong!” says Mr. Adams. “It makes a HUGE
difference!” Listen in as he gives specific examples of elections being affected
by voter fraud. “Permitting only registered voters and legal citizens to vote is
critical to safeguard elections,” he says.
“Counties have let the problem fester for years and it allows people to vote
illegally. When you have bad voter laws, you have an invitation to voter fraud,”
Christian Adams continues. This is why the ACRU has filed a lawsuit in various
counties in Texas concerning voter fraud. He discusses the recent ruling by the
Judge in Tarrant County and how it will affect future elections in that county.
They are hopeful that other Judges will do the same.
“Texas, as well as many other states, are failing to participate in the Kansas
Cross State Program and that’s a real problem,” Christian Adams declares. He
encourages everyone to call the Secretary of State, Governor Gregg Abbott, and
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, urging them to join the Kansas Cross State Program
immediately.
Listen in as Christian Adams discusses the importance of cleaning up the voter
rolls in Texas. Click [here] for more from Christian Adams and
The American Civil Rights Union.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
January 14, 2013
Title: Who is Really for Election Reform?
Topic: Election Reform
Discussed by Phyllis Schlafly
with Eagle Forum (www.eagleforum.org)
There is no doubt that the election process is flawed.
As it is with most issues, the Democrats and Republicans differ greatly on how to go about reform. Phyllis Schlafly is a well-respected leader in Texas and has influence throughout the country. What’s her take on it?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization