Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
November 19, 2020
Title: Changing the Meaning of Man and Woman
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
In an announcement that will make people's heads swim, Oxford
University Press agreed to change the meaning of the words "man" and "woman”.
But why?
Peter Sprigg has more details about this outrageous announcement, Apple TV’s new series about “gender fluid children”, and the controversial book “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Girls”.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why did the Oxford University Press agree to change the meaning of the words “man and woman”?
Is the Left’s high-speed gender train focused on our children?
Is Apple TV debuting a new docuseries meant to persuade parents that ALL children are gender fluid?
Peter has been reporting on homosexuality issues for nearly two decades. How many people identified as transgender or non-gender conforming back then? How has this number changed today? What are the main influencers?
Peter makes an excellent point: “Young people are always going to feel uncomfortable with their bodies. We should be reassuring them that they were born in exactly the right body for them.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Changing the Meaning of Man and Woman
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do the majority of children and teens who question their gender grow out of
those thoughts and live normal, productive adult lives?
Who wrote the book “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our
Girls”? How did Target get caught up in the mess? What did Conservatives do
in retaliation?
More on this issue from Peter and the Family Research Council can be
found
here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 9, 2020
Title: The Life Story YouTube Is Terrified People Will Watch
Topic: Free Speech Rights
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
LGBTQ activists want you to “trust your kids” when it comes
to the sexuality and gender identification. The truth is, though, that 80-95% of kids/teens with gender dysphoria will “grow out of it”. Yep. That’s right!
Peter Sprigg has more details about a banned YouTube video concerning this issue. Peter is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council. His research and writing have addressed issues of marriage and family, human sexuality, the arts and entertainment, and religion in public life.
Click here to view Walt Heyer’s testimony.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does the Left often craft powerful statements through the use of stories?
The LGBTQ community has been using personal stories for decades to win favor in the hearts and minds of the masses. What is Walt Heyer’s story?
Walt Heyer stated this: “This is a childhood developmental disorder.”
Are those the words that sent YouTube running for the delete button claiming hate speech?
Is gender dysphoria still considered a psychological/mental disorder? This has a complicated answer. Listen close!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - The Life Story YouTube Is Terrified People Will Watch
Topic: Free Speech Rights
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Walt Heyer has an amazing testimony. Does he quote facts and figures, as well?
Did Walt Heyer’s testimony on YouTube have many views? Did its popularity catch
the attention of YouTube?
Peter Sprigg discusses other stories of children who suffered from gender
dysphoria…
Is there a substantial amount of people who regret having gender reassignment
surgery? Do many people who have gender reassignment surgery commit suicide?
Do some people who suffer from gender dysphoria have other physical and mental
ailments?
Why does the Left attempt to censor the Right so often?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 13, 2020
Title: Starbucks Supports Sex Change Operations for Kids
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
From a mother, pleading for help: "Once we have cut that beautiful body, when the voice is permanently broken, the beard is there for good, the breasts are gone, what happens if the body was never wrong to start with? What will you tell the daughters that realize, too late, that they have destroyed their ability to bear children, or to nurse them? I plead with you to hear the parents, and the many stories of young people who have changed their minds after medical transition. This is not health care; this is a medical experiment. This is not life-saving care, these are criminal actions. And [it] must be stopped."
Peter Sprigg explains what this is all about on today’s program. Peter is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the
Family Research Council.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do many teens allow someone else to “bully” them into taking puberty-blocking drugs and even having a sex-change operation?
Are the number of sex-change requests exploding exponentially?
Does Starbucks encourage children and teens to “follow their trues self”? Peter Sprigg explains what Starbucks is promoting…
Are proceeds at Starbucks donated to an pro-transgender organization?
Do studies indicated that 90% or so of gender confused children grow out of their confusion and live normal, production lives as their biological sex?
Can this increase in desired sex-change inquiries be attributed to the old saying: “Monkey see. Monkey do.”?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Starbucks Supports Sex Change Operations for Kids
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
If a young boy or young girl likes to set fires, do we encourage and enable
their behavior? This might seem ridiculous in some people’s minds, but this
is really not far-fetched due to the damage transgenderism and homosexuality
cause. Peter also brings up the eating/mental disorder anorexia. It’s the same
thing!
Will you commit right now not to go to Starbucks?
Click here for more from Peter
Sprigg and the Family Research Council.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 20, 2019
Title: Punish the Wicked Christian
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Is Nancy Pelosi’s HR5 (The Equality Act) oppressive? Furthermore, why is the US Chamber of Commerce carrying the water for the LGBTQ movement? Are they being bullied into such an activist position?
Peter Sprigg is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies with the Family Research Council. Today he will be discussing a hot topic:
Is Big Business now pushing the LGBTQ movement?
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What are the oppressive realities of Democrat Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s HR5 (The Equality Act)? What aspects of businesses, organizations, and even the government will it affect?
Peter Sprigg has been working with the FRC for eighteen years. Is HR5 unlike anything he has ever seen before?
Drag queens reading at libraries and pedophiles in day care centers. Is this the direction we are headed?
Has the transgender agenda advanced far more rapidly than anyone could have foreseen?
Do lesbians and radical feminists actually OPPOSE men in women bathrooms?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Punish the Wicked Christian
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is the sole focus of the US Chamber of Commerce?
Is big government, under Democrat House Leadership, wanting to dictate every
aspect of businesses, large and small?
Is the US Chamber of Commerce facing immense pressure from the bullies within
the LGBTQ community?
You can read more on this issue
here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 26, 2019
Title: Separate Bathroom History: Let Anyone In
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Laws in the U.S. did not address the issue of separating public restrooms by sex until the end of the 19th Century when Massachusetts became the first state to enact such a statute. By 1920, over 40 states had adopted similar legislation requiring that public restrooms be separated by sex.
What is the new tactic now, though, by the LGBTQ crowd? Peter Sprigg, a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the
FRC, has the details…
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Recently, an attorney for a transgendered person argued against separate bathrooms for women in the workplace. How did a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rule on this?
What is the “blindness theory”?
Should Courts be rewriting laws just because LGBTQ activists have not persuaded Congress to do so?
Is it time for women to stand up and demand their right to privacy? Is it time for men to defend all the women in their lives?
On another note: Should biological males who identify as female be permitted to participate in women’s sports?
How can we reach Conservatives who don’t normally vote, but believe this is an important issue?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 2, 2018
Title: Reversing the Male and Female Switch
Topic: Gender Dysphoria
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 3
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Dr. Miroslav Djordjevic is not your normal physician. He came to fame more than two decades ago, making a name for himself as one of the world's premiere genital reconstruction surgeons. After years of helping men and women transition into a body they weren't born with, he's started to realize something: the procedure called sex reassignment surgery isn't making patients happy.
Peter Sprigg has the details….
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why has Dr. Djordjevic changed his tune about sex reassignment surgery?
What has Peter Sprigg discovered in his own research on this issue?
Do many people who identify as transgender have mental health issues?
If the other mental health issues are addressed, will the gender dysphoria disappear?
Is the medical community too afraid of the transgender lobby to properly and scientifically study the attempted suicide rate?
Is peer pressure a factor when young people “decide” they are transgender?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 3 - Reversing the Male and Female Switch
Topic: Gender Dysphoria
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do the majority of boys and girls grow out of their gender dysphoria?
What is driving this rapid onset of gender dysphoria?
Are there online communities that coach teens in how to lie to their parents and
even doctors in order to get hormone treatment and gender reassignment surgery?
Why are some homosexuals (mainly lesbians) angry with the transgender community?
How many states have outlawed psychological help for those with gender
dysphoria?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 3 - Reversing the Male and Female Switch
Topic: Gender Dysphoria
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is there proof that some who have had sex reassignment surgery want to return to
their natural biological sex?
Does the Left care about the people? Or do they care about their agenda?
What should a parent do if their child questions their sexual identity? Listen
as Peter Sprigg offers questions to ask, questions NOT to ask, and how to react
in a calm and loving manner. He also recommends
Help 4 Families.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 23, 2018
Title: How to Respond to the LGBT Movement
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 4
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Peter Sprigg is the author of a new op-ed/brochure, “How to Respond to the LGBT Movement”.
Today, Peter will offer information that will enable believers to defend traditional marriage and dispel the myth that a person is born either gay, lesbian, bisexual, or straight. Peter will also be discussing the false claim that there is no harm in being homosexual or transgendered.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is the “Gay Identity Paradigm”?
Do LGBT activists accuse heterosexuals of believing they are superior over homosexuals?
Are heterosexuals who believe homosexuals are sinning often called bigots?
Is it misguided and illogical to question the motives of social Conservatives based on the
Gay Identity Paradigm?
Is sexual orientation an umbrella term for three different things: sexual attraction, sexual conduct, and sexual identity?
Tune in to the next segment as Peter Sprigg discusses some of the false claims used against social Conservatives by the LGBT activists.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 4 - How to Respond to the LGBT Movement
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Listen as Peter Sprigg discusses some of the false claims used against social
Conservatives by the LGBT activists:
False Claim # 1: Sexual orientation is an innate personal characteristic like
race.
False Claim # 2: Social Conservatives hate gay people for who they are.
False Claim # 3: People are born either straight, gay, lesbian, or bisexual.
False Claim # 4: Gay people can never become straight. Therapy to change
someone’s sexual orientation never works and is always harmful.
Click here to read and
download Peter Sprigg’s new op-ed/brochure, “How to Respond to the LGBT
Movement”.
Peter will discuss three more false claims in the next segment…
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 3 of 4 - How to Respond to the LGBT Movement
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Listen as Peter continues to discuss the false claim that homosexuals can never
become straight.
False Claim # 5: Gay sex is no more harmful than any other type of sex.
NOTE: In Peter’s op-ed/brochure, “How to Respond to the
LGBT Movement”, he goes into much more detail about the dangers of
homosexual sex, including quotes from the Center for Disease Control. You can
find it here.
False Claim # 6: Societal discrimination and stigma are the only reasons why
gays and lesbians have higher rates of mental health problems.
False Claim # 7: Religion is the only reason anyone opposes homosexual conduct.
Tune in to the last segment with Peter Sprigg as he discusses the false
claims from the TRANSGENDER movement.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 4 of 4 - How to Respond to the LGBT Movement
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Responding to the TRANSGENDER Movement: Like the homosexual movement, the
transgender movement depends upon a distinct set of claims/assertions which
actually have little factual or scientific foundation to support them.
Some of the false TRANSGENDER claims are:
False Transgender Claim # 1: Some people are born in the wrong body.
False Transgender Claim # 2: Surgery can change a person’s sex.
False Transgender Claim # 3: Only subjective distress makes gender dysphoria a
disorder.
False Transgender Claim # 4: Gender non-conforming children will grow up to be
transgender and no treatment can prevent this.
False Transgender Claim # 5: Gender reassignment surgery is proven, safe, and
effective.
NOTE: Peter Sprigg has an article on this issue, “Is Gender
Reassignment Surgery Medically Necessary?” found at the below link…
False Transgender Claim # 6: Transgender people are not mentally ill or prone to
high-risk behavior.
False Transgender Claim # 7: Gender is not binary, and the existence of intersex
people proves this.
False Transgender Claim # 8: Mental health treatment cannot reduce gender
dysphoria.
Should lawmakers, counselors, pastors, teachers, or medical professionals
participate in or reinforce the transgender movement’s lies about sexuality?
Should lawmakers, counselors, pastors, teachers, or medical professionals be
required by the government to support such distortion?
Click here to
read and download Peter Sprigg’s new op-ed/brochure, “How to Respond to the
LGBT Movement”.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 9, 2018
Title: Is Gender Reassignment Surgery Medically Necessary?
Topic: Gender Dysphoria
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
According to the American Psychiatric Association, “transgender” individuals are those “who transiently or permanently identify with a gender different from their natal gender.” The fundamental goal of the transgender movement is for those who identify as transgender to be fully accepted in the social role of the gender they choose to identify with, regardless of their actual biological sex.
Peter Sprigg is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the
Family Research Council in Washington, D.C.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why is the medical community now referring to sex change procedures as gender reassignment surgery?
What does medically necessary mean?
What is the difference between cosmetic and elective surgery?
Is there a difference in approval procedures whether the payee will be private insurance or Medicaid?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Is Gender Reassignment Surgery Medically Necessary?
Topic: Gender Dysphoria
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Are there studies that show the negative results of gender reassignment surgery?
Peter Sprigg offers some very shocking information. Listen in!
Are suicide rates higher for people who have received gender reassignment
surgery?
Aren’t doctors required to “do no harm”? How can they perform gender
reassignment surgery if the patient is at risk, mentally, physically, and
emotionally?
To read Peter Sprigg’s paper on this issue, click
here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 3, 2017
Title: Whose Rights Should Trump?
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, discusses
some very critical information that affects us all: The Transgender Agenda.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is the true transgender population in America?
Whose rights should Trump?
Who should decide which facility “transgenders” use – Federal or State entities?
Concerning the Constitution… Is the Constitution, as well as other government
documents obsolete, needing change?
What is Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972? Is the left grossly
misrepresenting this law in regards to bathrooms?
Should boys be allowed to share girl’s facilities, no matter their “gender
identification”?
Click here for more from Peter Sprigg.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 28, 2016
Title: Democrats Stretch the Truth
Topic: Who Is Lying?
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
When the facts don’t line up with the left’s ideas and beliefs, what do they do? They attack the fact-finders!
Peter Sprigg is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., focusing on issues of marriage and family, human sexuality, the arts and entertainment, and religion in public life.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do progressives focus on only their personal and political agenda, specifically concerning the social issues?
Two questions from a recent study by researchers affiliated with John Hopkins University:
Is the “born gay” argument used to defend the homosexual lifestyle choice fact or fiction? And, is “transgenderism” pure political correctness?
Progressives have already attacked small business owners (bakers/florists/photographers) who stand for protecting life and traditional marriage. Have Progressives started attacking Universities and scholars who dare disagree with their mindset?
Listen in as Peter Sprigg discusses a study from the 1960’s concerning sex-reassignment surgery and what is happening now.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 24, 2016
Title: Democrats Stretch the Truth
Topic: Who Is Lying?
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
When the facts don’t line up with the left’s ideas and beliefs, what do they do? They attack the fact-finders!
Peter Sprigg is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., focusing on issues of marriage and family, human sexuality, the arts and entertainment, and religion in public life.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Do progressives focus on only their personal and political agenda, specifically concerning the social issues?
Two questions from a recent study by researchers affiliated with John Hopkins University:
Is the “born gay” argument used to defend the homosexual lifestyle choice fact or fiction? And, is “transgenderism” pure political correctness?
Progressives have already attacked small business owners (bakers/florists/photographers) who stand for protecting life and traditional marriage. Have Progressives started attacking Universities and scholars who dare disagree with their mindset?
Listen in as Peter Sprigg discusses a study from the 1960’s concerning sex-reassignment surgery and what is happening now.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 11, 2016
Title: Mississippi Guided by Facts – Not Fear
Topic: Christian Persecution
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Years from now, no one will remember if a sporting event was held in a particular city.
But communities and the God-fearing, freedom-loving Americans who live in them will be reminded daily in a thousand ways if their freedom to believe was lost because of the cowardice of political leaders. Peter Sprigg, with the
Family Research Council, is here today to discuss a recent decision by the Governor of Mississippi. He really “stuck it in the face” of liberals big time!
Peter explains that the Legislators in Mississippi passed the “Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act”. The bill’s purpose is to prevent discrimination by the government against people who uphold the Biblical standard of marriage as between one man and one woman. “It is a sensible bill about freedom, not about discrimination,” Peter states.
Peter reveals that this law specifically protects individuals and business owners who work within the wedding industry from retribution if they refuse service to a homosexual couple. This includes, but is not limited to, photographers, bakers, wedding venues, and florists. “It is not the person they choose not to offer a particular service to. It is the nature of the event,” Peter says.
Is the LGBTQ crowd really tolerant? “If people really believe in diversity, they should also tolerate a diversity of viewpoints and not just a diversity of sexual behavior,” Peter points out. And he’s absolutely right!
Homosexual lobbyists are now going after the politicians in various states like Mississippi, using celebrities and big corporations to pressure them into accepting anti-Christian laws and regulations. However, Peter believes that the average American really doesn’t care for the way the LGBTQ and big business are interfering with the daily lives of individuals and business owners. It’s not the government’s business!
Mississippi is proactively protecting its citizens and taking a stand against the norm. North Carolina is coming under pressure from PayPal because of a “bathroom
protection law” being considered. Peter urges everyone – even if you don’t live in North Carolina – to contact
PayPal and express your opinion on their decision to not do business there.
For more on this issue from Peter Sprigg and the Family Research Council,
click here.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 7, 2015
Title: Save One More Child
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young
children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to
understand.
Advocates against homosexual and transgender reparative therapy argue that the
efforts are harmful and ineffective. But where is there scientific evidence?
Peter Sprigg is a Senior
Fellow for Policy Studies with the Family
Research Council. Peter discusses some early “gay gene”
studies in the 1990’s that many in the MSM still use today although pro-gay
activists don’t! Why? Because they don’t prove anything! They can’t! It’s all
lies and twisted results.
Peter also explains the recent surge in HIV/AIDS cases among males ages 13-20.
Many of the males continue to have sex once infected because it can take years
for symptoms to surface and raise red flags, therefore infecting others who
infect others and so forth. Many of these males did not choose to voluntarily
have sex with another male; most of them were raped or sexually molested, some
at sleepover parties at a young age.
When a parent becomes aware of sexual abuse in their children, they obviously
seek therapy to help their child cope with the trauma. This type of therapy is
fine and acceptable by all in the field; however, it is when you dig deeper and
let the child know it is not okay to have a same-sex attraction… that is the
issue. Gay activists want children to be told it’s completely natural to be
attracted to the same sex, even after they’ve been abused. Herein lies the
problem.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Save One More Child
Topic: Transgender Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young
children. Issues discussed might be upsetting or hard for little ones to
understand.
“Parents should have the ultimate authority to provide for their children’s
mental health just as they have the authority and responsibility to care for
their physical health,” guest Peter Sprigg says. He goes on to explain how
advocates against reparative therapy try to spin the issue into a hateful,
homophobic, bullying tactic. Peter has met many, many therapists who have never
forced any child or parent to go against their will with this type of therapy.
Furthermore, the term “conversion therapy” is used by the MSM – not by
therapists – to make it sound hateful and bigoted. Peter prefer to call it
“sexual orientation therapy” or even “sexual orientation change efforts”. Listen
in as he explains the difference and why spiritual therapy is so important to
the process, as well.
For more on this issues, click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 10, 2015
Title: County Clerks Have a Decision to Make
Topic: Religious Freedom
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
As of the time of this interview, County Clerks in Texas and their employees
can choose not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, as long as there
is one employee in the office who is willing to do so. Justice of the Peace
Judges can choose not to perform same-sex marriages, but if they make that
decision, they must stop doing all marriages.
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council,
gives a minister’s opinion on the same-sex marriage issue. County clerks and
JP’s duties are different than a minister or pastor’s duties. But the baker,
florist, photographer, and wedding chapel owner thought their rights were
protected. Will the same thing happen to ministers and pastors?
Now that the homosexual mafia has won this small battle, what will happen next?
Peter Sprigg believes the other side will become even more aggressive. This is
not about homosexual marriage or even equal rights; it’s about silencing
Christians. Period. We must fight back. Click here for more on this
and other issues affecting our religious freedom.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 28, 2015
Title: It’s a Small Minority
Topic: Defending Traditional Marriage
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Christians seem to be discriminated against every time we turn around. The
biggest issue right now is the redefinition of marriage. Only a small minority
of the American public actually agrees that homosexuals should have the legal
right to marry. Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, says he is yet
to see a poll which reveals people think the US Supreme Court should change the
definition of marriage in all 50 states. People do not want SCOTUS to overrule
state’s rights.
Peter discusses a Harvard law professor who, in cahoots with others, filed a
brief with the high court, urging them to follow “emerging global consensus” in
favor of homosexual marriage. The UN is not buying into the lie. And even Russia
criminalizes teachers who try to influence students concerning homosexual
behavior! Peter gives the juicy details on countries who have legalized gay
marriage across the globe. Listen in!
It isn’t just about religious discrimination, Peter believes. It’s also about
religious liberty. The Constitution ensures the religious rights of individuals,
businesses, and charities, but the small minority is chipping away at them. The
Obama administration is attempting to redefine religious rights in the most
horrifying way and Christians need to step up to the plate and say “NO!”
Roman Catholic Bishop, Francis Cardinal George, said: “I will die in my bed. My
successor will die in jail. And his successor will die a martyr in the public
square.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 29, 2015
Title: It’s a Small Minority
Topic: Defending Traditional Marriage
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Christians seem to be discriminated against every time we turn around. The
biggest issue right now is the redefinition of marriage. Only a small minority
of the American public actually agrees that homosexuals should have the legal
right to marry. Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, says he is yet
to see a poll which reveals people think the US Supreme Court should change the
definition of marriage in all 50 states. People do not want SCOTUS to overrule
state’s rights.
Peter discusses a Harvard law professor who, in cahoots with others, filed a
brief with the high court, urging them to follow “emerging global consensus” in
favor of homosexual marriage. The UN is not buying into the lie. And even Russia
criminalizes teachers who try to influence students concerning homosexual
behavior! Peter gives the juicy details on countries who have legalized gay
marriage across the globe. Listen in!
It isn’t just about religious discrimination, Peter believes. It’s also about
religious liberty. The Constitution ensures the religious rights of individuals,
businesses, and charities, but the small minority is chipping away at them. The
Obama administration is attempting to redefine religious rights in the most
horrifying way and Christians need to step up to the plate and say “NO!”
Roman Catholic Bishop, Francis Cardinal George, said: “I will die in my bed. My
successor will die in jail. And his successor will die a martyr in the public
square.”
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 9, 2015
Title: Christian Discrimination
Topic: Christian Discrimination in America
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
The newest “fad” is
Christian Discrimination. A gay couple can sue a Christian baker, florist, or
photographer in America – and the gay couple will win loads and loads of money.
A straight, Christian man can sue a gay baker for refusing to bake a cake with
the 10 Commandments – and the straight, Christian man will lose. Christian
Discrimination. Plain and simple.
Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRA’s) across the nation have not
been entirely successful, despite being the law of the land – the entire land –
for over two decades. The uproar the Gay Mafia is causing now is nothing but “a
paranoid delusion concerning these laws” according to Peter Sprigg. They
claim the RFRA’s are a “license to discriminate against homosexuals.”
Listen in as Peter explains why this is an outright lie.
Peter Sprigg also gives his opinion about the Gay Mafia coming after churches
and pastors. He says, “Once they’ve succeeded in excluding traditional
values from the public square altogether, than they will put the squeeze on
churches by taking away their tax exemption.” Peter hopes we never get to
that point, but we must be prepared with clear by-laws in all churches regarding
who can and who cannot marry in the church, just in case.
NOTE: If you think there aren’t many gay activists suing Christian small
business owners concerning homosexual issues, think again. There are 58 active
cases! 58!
Click [here] for more from the Family
Research Council on this and other issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 16, 2015
Title: The Rights of Many Ignored for the Rights of a Few
Topic: Gay Rights
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use
caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed
might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Many of you may have heard about a recent incident at a Planet Fitness involving
a woman and a “transgender man”. If not, short recap: Yvette Cormier discovered
a man changing in the woman’s locker room. She complained to management, who
informed her that the man identified as a woman and, therefore, was allowed to
be in the woman’s locker room – naked. Yvette complained to the corporate
office, who told her the same thing. As a result of her “discrimination”, her
membership to the Planet Fitness was revoked.
Peter Sprigg is a Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research
Council in Washington, D.C., where his research and writing have addressed
issues of marriage and family, human sexuality, the arts and entertainment, and
religion in public life. Peter explains the situation further and the “no
judgment policy” Planet Fitness exploited in order to pander to the
transgender man.
All this for only 0.3% of the American population. 0.3%.
According to the company's PR director, "Planet Fitness is committed to
creating a non-intimidating, welcoming environment for our members. Our gender
identity non-discrimination policy states that members and guests may use all
facilities based on their sincere self-reported gender identity." Peter
discusses this line of reasoning. Why is it so wrong? What is next for our
country if we continue with this line of perversion and bowing to a few,
overlooking the needs of many?
Peter says this of acceptance of immoral practices: “The ideal for the
homosexual movement is that no one will ever say it is morally wrong to have sex
with someone of the same sex or to pretend to be the opposite of your biological
sex.” This is what our teens and college kids are taught. This is why we
have “transgender” bathrooms, gym locker rooms, and changing rooms in department
stores. This is why Christians must stand up now – before it is too late.
Peter Sprigg can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
February 3, 2015
Title: Is Gay Marriage Really That Bad?
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use
caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed
might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Why should Christians be concerned about gay marriage or those who wish to marry
their parent or a sibling? What does it matter if an old man wants to marry a
teenage girl? Who cares if two men want to marry the same woman or one man wants
to marry five women? Does it really matter?
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, says it matters A LOT! He says
social science research proves that heterosexual marriages (between one natural
born man and one natural born woman) offer the best and most stable home
environment for children. Any other family structure carries risks of social and
emotional harm and problems. Those promoting other lifestyle choices are
ignoring the facts; they know the truth, but lie anyway.
Listen in as Peter Sprigg explains the facts and myths about heterosexual
marriage, co-habitation, gay partnerships, and other types of relationships in
regards to children and the mental stability. Peter also discusses what might
happen if the SOTUS passes a law legalizing gay marriage in every state in
America and the floodgates which could open.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Freedom of Religion vs Freedom of Worship
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Disclaimer: Use
caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed
might be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
What is the difference between Freedom of “Religion” and Freedom of “Worship”?
Peter says, “Anyone who thinks religion consists only of attending a worship
service in a church building, not does understand what it’s all about.”
The Obama administration seems to favor the phrase “Freedom of Worship” because
it offers a more narrow scope of expression. “This is not what the Founding
Fathers had in mind”, says Peter Sprigg. Listen in to find out what he
means by this statement!
Peter also discusses the issue of the LGBT “equal rights ordinances” that have
been spreading far and wide across the nation. It’s not just in Houston or
Texas; Peter just came back from a city in Idaho concerning the issue! What’s
happening with these “gender identity” laws that are popping up everywhere? The
issue isn’t only about homosexuals trying to push their lifestyle on those who
might see it as immoral. The bigger issue is heterosexual pedophiles who will
exploit these laws to prey on the opposite sex in order to satisfy a deeper,
more disturbing “need”.
What about teenage boys using the girl’s locker room at school and the girl’s
bathroom? Should they be permitted to play on girls’ sports teams? Will the
“accommodating” ever end?
For more on this and other issues, click [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 31, 2014
Title: Is America Ready for Same Sex Marriage Everywhere?
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
When the US Supreme
Court recently declined to take up the constitutionality of marriage defined as
between one (natural) man and one (natural) woman, they basically told
individual states “We don’t care what you want”. Does this mean that gay
marriage is here to stay and will soon be in every state in the nation? Or will
the fight continue and become the Roe v Wade of marriage?
Peter Sprigg calls the SCOTUS members “cowards”, saying their decision has made
it necessary for lower court judges to make all future decisions in regards to
same-sex marriage. Peter doesn’t think this is unpersuasive and even
constitutional.
Another issue discussed in this segment are the many recent Christian-owned
companies and businesses that have been targeted by homosexuals wishing to marry
– the baker, the florist, the reception venue, and now even the minister. This
is just getting out of hand. Why are these gay couples so adamant about using
these businesses when they have so many other options? “This is not an equal
balance of the risks and harms”, says Peter Sprigg. “Gay couples can go
somewhere else. Business owners are forced to close their doors.”
Peter also makes an important observation that many may not have realized. One
of the statements by the LGBT is: “We just want the fundamental right to marry
the person of our choice.” But no one – not even heterosexuals – have the right
to marry the person of their choice. We can’t marry a 9 year old. We can’t marry
a close blood relative. We can’t marry someone if we are already married. Up
until the last 10 years, no one was allowed to marry a person of their same sex.
Peter says this is a sensitive issue, because once we give in to “them”, when
will the restrictions on marrying a child, marrying a relative, and marrying
multiple partners be lifted?
For more on this and other issues affecting our faith, log on to
www.FRC.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 21, 2014
Title: Is America Ready for Same Sex Marriage Everywhere?
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
When the US Supreme
Court recently declined to take up the constitutionality of marriage defined as
between one (natural) man and one (natural) woman, they basically told
individual states “We don’t care what you want”. Does this mean that gay
marriage is here to stay and will soon be in every state in the nation? Or will
the fight continue and become the Roe v Wade of marriage?
Peter Sprigg calls the SCOTUS members “cowards”, saying their decision has made
it necessary for lower court judges to make all future decisions in regards to
same-sex marriage. Peter doesn’t think this is unpersuasive and even
constitutional.
Another issue discussed in this segment are the many recent Christian-owned
companies and businesses that have been targeted by homosexuals wishing to marry
– the baker, the florist, the reception venue, and now even the minister. This
is just getting out of hand. Why are these gay couples so adamant about using
these businesses when they have so many other options? “This is not an equal
balance of the risks and harms”, says Peter Sprigg. “Gay couples can go
somewhere else. Business owners are forced to close their doors.”
Peter also makes an important observation that many may not have realized. One
of the statements by the LGBT is: “We just want the fundamental right to marry
the person of our choice.” But no one – not even heterosexuals – have the right
to marry the person of their choice. We can’t marry a 9 year old. We can’t marry
a close blood relative. We can’t marry someone if we are already married. Up
until the last 10 years, no one was allowed to marry a person of their same sex.
Peter says this is a sensitive issue, because once we give in to “them”, when
will the restrictions on marrying a child, marrying a relative, and marrying
multiple partners be lifted?
For more on this and other issues affecting our faith, log on to
www.FRC.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 15, 2014
Title: By Hook or By Crook
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) sounds great but it is actually a very, very scary proposal. Christians, wake up! The homosexuals (less than three percent of our entire population) are taking over our country!
If you are a Christian and you own a small business, you are a target. If you are a Christian and you refuse service to a homosexual, you will be sued. And if you are sued, you will lose – even if you win.
Non-profits are also at risk. Churches will not be exempt, either. Maybe not right away, but eventually. Listen in as Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, gives a dire warning we all must heed. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 12, 2014
Title: By Hook or By Crook
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) sounds great but it is actually a very, very scary proposal. Christians, wake up! The homosexuals (less than three percent of our entire population) are taking over our country!
If you are a Christian and you own a small business, you are a target. If you are a Christian and you refuse service to a homosexual, you will be sued. And if you are sued, you will lose – even if you win.
Non-profits are also at risk. Churches will not be exempt, either. Maybe not right away, but eventually. Listen in as Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, gives a dire warning we all must heed. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 12, 2014
Title: The GOP's Marry-Go-Round
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Whoever declared an end to the marriage debate must not have consulted
Republicans. While the media is busy eulogizing one of the hottest issues of the
last 15 years, those who vote for GOP candidates are saying, "Not so fast!"
Turns out, pronouncing marriage dead is convenient -- but not credible.
Earlier this spring, FRC and American Values set out to gauge how the Republican
base really feels about an issue that, until recently, was non-negotiable in the
GOP. With help from Wilson Research Strategies, we asked a couple of
straightforward questions about the party's core values - and what pollsters
found might surprise you.
Peter Spring can be found at www.FRC.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
April 30, 2014
Title: The GOP's Marry-Go-Round
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Whoever declared an end to the marriage debate must not have consulted
Republicans. While the media is busy eulogizing one of the hottest issues of the
last 15 years, those who vote for GOP candidates are saying, "Not so fast!"
Turns out, pronouncing marriage dead is convenient -- but not credible.
Earlier this spring, FRC and American Values set out to gauge how the Republican
base really feels about an issue that, until recently, was non-negotiable in the
GOP. With help from Wilson Research Strategies, we asked a couple of
straightforward questions about the party's core values - and what pollsters
found might surprise you.
Peter Spring can be found at www.FRC.org.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 13, 2013
Title: Should the Rights of Gays Outweigh the Rights of the Recipients?
Topic: Gay Rights
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Currently, men who are sexually active with other men are barred from
donating blood because they are at a higher risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, explains why it is imperative for the safety of the public that this ban remain in place.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 12, 2013
Title: USAID Spends $11 Million Training Gay Activists In Colombia
Topic: Training Gay Activists
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Did we miss the
headlines announcing that all hungry people in the world now have all the food
they need? Did we miss the headlines announcing that all the sick people in the
world now have access to health care?
If we did not miss those headlines and there are still hungry, sick people in
the world, then why are we, yes “we” the American taxpayer - paying $11 million
to train gay activists in Columbia and other South American countries through
the USAID?
Their motto: “WE ARE QUEER – WE ARE HERE – AND WE ARE IN YOU FACE.” Never forget
they say, “Sex after 8 is too late!” They don’t want you or me, they want our
kids. But I go to church, the preacher preaches, and I go home. That is what
Christians do now.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 2, 2012
Title: Will The Marriage Redefinition Platform Disadvantage The Democratic Party?
Topic: Democratic Party
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Part 1 of 2
Please explain to
our listeners what exactly has the platform committee with the democratic
platform come up with?
Will the marriage redefinition platform disadvantage the Democratic party? Will
it be a battle, or will it be overwhelmingly approved at the convention?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Democratic Party
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Will the inclusion of the
homosexual marriage plank in the national democrat platform help the democrats
raise millions and millions of dollars from gay activists that tend to be upper
middle to upper class Americans?
Aren't there some mega-donor, homosexual activists that are giving to
republicans to help soften the republican stand against the lifestyle and
marriage of homosexuals?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 29, 2010
Title: New Study Shows Younger people Value Marriage
Topic: Boycotts
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Segment 1 of 2
According to new study, only five percent of Americans under age 30 do NOT
plan on marrying. Is this a good sign for the Pro-Family Movement?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: New Study Shows Younger people Value Marriage
Topic: Boycotts
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Segment 2 of 2
Ninety-five percent of Americans younger than 30 plan to marry. But out of
wedlock births are still skyrocketing with 41% of all births to unwed mothers.
What can be done to reverse the trend of out of wedlock births?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 16, 2010
Title: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA Part 1 of 5
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Spriggs, with the Family Research Council, discusses the Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality in today’s program. The entire program is dedicated to this topic because the issue is expanding deeper into our school systems and government. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA Part 2 of 5
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, discusses the Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality in today’s program. The entire program is dedicated to this topic because the issue is expanding deeper into our school systems and government. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA Part 3 of 5
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, discusses the Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality in today’s program. The entire program is dedicated to this topic because the issue is expanding deeper into our school systems and government. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA Part 4 of 5
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, discusses the Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality in today’s program. The entire program is dedicated to this topic because the issue is expanding deeper into our school systems and government. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: THE HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA Part 5 of 5
Topic: The Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, discusses the Top Ten Myths About Homosexuality in today’s program. The entire program is dedicated to this topic because the issue is expanding deeper into our school systems and government. Log on to www.FRC.org for more.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 9, 2005
Title: Radicals Use Invasion Tactics
Topic: Free Speech Rights
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
Radical groups, including the violent homosexual group ACT-UP, are chaining themselves inside offices demanding that Conservatives stop pushing abstinence. Throwing condoms through private areas of the Family Research Council offices and shouting and condemning the Abstinence Promoters as "KILLERS", the 'invaders' were taken away by police. Note: If we did this inside an abortion clinic, we would still be in jail and on our way to a lengthy prison stay. What hipocrisy! Peter Sprigg, with the Family Research Council, gives more insight. www.frc.org
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
June 28, 2005
Title: Cable and Satellite Choice is Needed Now!
Topic: Cable Choice is Channel Choice
Discussed by Peter Sprigg
with Family Research Council (www.FRC.org)
If you wanted only 10 gallons of gas but you had to pay for 20, would that make you mad? If you had to buy a Playboy magazine everytime you purchased a gallon of milk, would that make you mad? Then why aren't you mad about having to pay for smut on your TV provided by your cable TV company? Get mad and take action! For more info: www.parentstv.org
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization