Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
October 11, 2024
Title: Anti-Rights: The New Censorship Weapon of the Left
Topic: Discrimination Against Conservatives
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Director of Research at the Center for
Family and Human Rights. Today, Rebecca discusses the new “anti-rights” phrase coming from the
United Nations and why Conservatives, especially Christian Conservatives, need
to be paying attention.
Click
here to read Rebecca’s important article on this topic.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is the use of the term “anti-rights” becoming more common place to describe
opponents of progressive social policies like abortion, comprehensive sexuality
education, homosexual marriage, and transgender policies? Dr. Oas explains why
this new phrase is so dangerous, saying: “When you actually look at who is being
labeled… it’s not radical fringe groups or terrorist groups; it’s mainstream
Conservatives.”
By using the term “anti-rights”, are those in power wanting to become the
gatekeepers of those allowed to speak? Why is their message so appealing to
people, even Christians?
How do we pushback against this “anti-rights” trend? Why should Christians care
about what happens within the United Nations?
Click here to help support the Center for Family and Human Rights.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 8, 2024
Title: Anti-Rights: The New Censorship Weapon of the Left
Topic: Discrimination Against Conservatives
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Director of Research at the Center for
Family and Human Rights. Today, Rebecca discusses the new “anti-rights” phrase coming from the
United Nations and why Conservatives, especially Christian Conservatives, need
to be paying attention.
Click
here to read Rebecca’s important article on this topic.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is the use of the term “anti-rights” becoming more common place to describe
opponents of progressive social policies like abortion, comprehensive sexuality
education, homosexual marriage, and transgender policies? Dr. Oas explains why
this new phrase is so dangerous, saying: “When you actually look at who is being
labeled… it’s not radical fringe groups or terrorist groups; it’s mainstream
Conservatives.”
By using the term “anti-rights”, are those in power wanting to become the
gatekeepers of those allowed to speak? Why is their message so appealing to
people, even Christians?
How do we pushback against this “anti-rights” trend? Why should Christians care
about what happens within the United Nations?
Click here to help support the Center for Family and Human Rights.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
May 9, 2024
Title: Governments Complain about Low Birth Rate at UN Population Conference
Topic: Pro-Life Issues
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Western countries facing the same dilemma. Why, then, are they still
trying to sell the “less is more” propaganda?
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Director of Research at the Center for Family and
Human Rights. Today, Rebecca discusses the worldwide panic as leaders are
beginning to realize we need more people, not less.
Click
here to read the op-ed from C-Fam on this important topic.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What are the consequences of low fertility rates? Rebecca explains that we still
don’t know all the consequences, but reveals what we do know.
Are many governments in an angry panic about the results of decades long
propaganda favoring a lower worldwide population? Rebecca discusses the lies
from the UN and the Left about “population control” and what we must do
moving forward.
Click here to help support
the Center for Family and Human Rights.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 30, 2023
Title: UN Commission on Woman Ignored Benefits of Marriage
Topic: Defending Traditional Marriage
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Feminists are mad once again – this time at traditional marriage.
Can nothing make them happy?
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Director of Research at the Center for Family and
Human Rights. Today, Dr. Oas discusses a
new study from Global Epidemiology which shows that marriage is, in
fact, beneficial to women’s health and well-being.
Click
here to read Dr. Rebecca Oas’s op-ed on this issue.
Click here for more information about the
Center for Family and Human Rights.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Why do many feminists dislike the traditional family structure?
When coupling education and wealth with marriage, does the long-term well-being
of women increases? Dr. Oas reveals some of the findings, including lower
heart-related problems and happier lives.
Is there substantial evidence indicating that marriage is beneficial for women,
men, and their children?
Do children fare best when they are raised by their biological, married parents?
Click
here for the study Dr. Oas referenced by
Mark Regnerus with the University of Texas.
Is it important for pro-life, pro-family women to stand up and fight back
against feminists who are trying to destroy traditional marriage?
Why does the UN refuse to promote the traditional family structure? Dr. Oas
passionately explains why the UN needs to get back to their belief that the
traditional family structure is a “natural and fundamental group unit of
society”.
Is marriage declining while unmarried cohabitation and extramarital childbearing
becoming more common?
Click here to support the
Center for Family
and Human Rights as they continue to preserve international law by discrediting
socially radical policies at the United Nations and other international
institutions.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 19, 2021
Title: UN Radicals Targeting Teen Girls
Topic: Pro-Life Issues
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Today, Dr. Rebecca Oas shares the backstory on why the UN is targeting girls and families with abortion-on-demand, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and mutilating surgery. Dr. Oas is the Associate Director of Research for the Center for Family and Human Rights. Her focus areas are global maternal and child health and family planning.
Click here for more information about the Center for Family and Human Rights.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Where did this “agenda meeting” occur? Dr. Oas gives some background of what happened at a similar conference 25 years ago compared to this conference, called the Generation Equality Forum.
Why is the UN targeting teen girls? What is their agenda? What is their end-game?
How much is the UN spending on this agenda? How much are individual UN states committing to this agenda?
How much did Bill Gates commit? Are other Progressive organizations and wealthy individuals pledging insane amounts of money as well?
Are targeted countries and/or peoples clamoring for the money for abortion-on-demand, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and mutilating surgery?
HINT: Nope. They need education and other necessities!
How is the UN infiltrating countries that have abortion bans?
Why do locals call this “poison money”?
Can countries spend the money they’re given on other necessities? Or must they spend the money on abortion-on-demand, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and mutilating surgery?
Does the sexual left absolute hate the way C-Fam stands up to their wicked agenda? Rebecca says it’s ironic that the Left despises them and accuses them of hating females when over half of their staff is women at C-Fam.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
December 26, 2019
Title: Sex Ed is About to Get Worse
Topic: Sex Education
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Part 1 of 2
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
The Sexuality Information and Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS) is a US-based organization with a long history of promoting controversial curricula for children. They recently rebranded itself, declaring its mission to “promote radical social change through sex education”.
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Associate Director of Research for the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam). Dr. Oas earned her doctorate in Genetics and Molecular Biology at Emory University.
Among her focus areas are global maternal/child health and family planning. Today, Dr. Oas reveals how the changes at
SIECUS will effect children in public schools across the nation.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
First, what is the mission of the Center for Family and Human Rights?
Who is Alfred Kinsey? How did he conduct his “research studies” in sexual reproduction? If his studies were conducted today, would he be prosecuted for sex crimes? Listen close! This is crazy stuff, y’all!
Dr. Rebecca Oas recommends this
page for more information on the truth about Alfred Kinsey’s horrific research practices.
Was SIECUS founded 55 years ago by the Kinsey Institute?
Are many modern sex-ed curriculums, distributed by Planned Parenthood, based on Kinsey’s studies?
Why did SIECUS change its tagline to “Sex Education for Social Change”?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Sex Ed is About to Get Worse
Topic: Sex Education
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Disclaimer: Use caution when listening to this segment around young children. Issues discussed may be upsetting or hard for little ones to understand.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Is the focus of sex-ed materials from SIECUS Biblically based?
Can children give consent? Should they be able to? Is this on the lines of what
SIECUS is advocating?
Are we losing the younger generation to SIECUS, Alfred Kinsey, and
LGBTQ ideology?
Do too many pastors and church leaders avoid this topic?
Are many parents unaware of the topics being discussed in sex ed at public
schools?
What can parents do? Click here
to help C-Fam in their efforts to stop the homosexual radicalization of
our children and grandchildren.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
October 19, 2016
Title: The Devastation of the LGBTQ Agenda on Children
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Part 1 of 2
All children have a mother and a father. That is a
biological fact. A recent UN event, hosted by C-Fam, highlighted how those
rights are undermined by efforts to redefine the family in law and normalize
reproductive technologies in policy.
Dr. Rebecca Oas is the Associate Director of Research for the Center for
Family and Human Rights (C-Fam) in New York City. She is here today to give
more details about this event and what their decisions mean for your children
and grandchildren.
NOTE: We are acutely aware that not all families will look
like the “traditional” family. Many are single parents, and you are doing a
GREAT job! Many are foster parents, taking care of children until their
biological parents or other family members are able to care for them. Many are
adoptive parents, stepping in where the biological parents have failed. Some may
even be caring for grandchildren or nieces and nephews for a while. We commend
each and every one of you. These segments are not to, in any way, make you feel
less of a parent. Bottom line, these segments are to expose the twisted, evil
schemes of the LGBTQ community.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
Does family structure impact the lives of children into adulthood?
Do biological, married parents offer a significant protective effect on
children?
Is this once self-evident social aspect of an intact family raising their
children now becoming taboo in the rush to legitimize parenting by same-sex
couples?
Are there reliable studies focused on child-rearing and lasting effects on
children raised by same-sex partners?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - The Devastation of the LGBTQ Agenda on Children
Topic: Homosexual Agenda
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Why did C-Fam host this event for UN members?
Do children around the world have specific rights under the protection of the
UN?
Is the LGBTQ community attempting to thrust their agenda on countries around the
world? Are they pressuring other countries to also increase their abortion
deaths?
There are countries which are more pro-life and pro-family than American. How do
they view America’s abortion and gay rights movements?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
July 22, 2015
Title: Other Countries Get It.
Topic: Defending the Traditional Family at the UN
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Part 1 of 2
At the recent Geneva Convention, twenty-nine countries on the UN Human Rights
Council (UNHRC) approved a resolution to take steps to protect the traditional
family unit. This was an increase from last year, which is a huge victory for
pro-family advocates in light of the US Supreme Court’s recent pro-gay marriage
ruling. However, I’ll give you three guesses as to how American voted and the
first two don’t count.
Dr. Rebecca Oas is with the
Center for Family and
Human Rights. She says, “They (the UNHRC) recognize that the
family has a role that is extremely important in ensuring that rights are
protected, especially for the most vulnerable members of society: children, the
elderly, and the disabled…. They have to consider the family unit… The more the
family is empowered to do – to care for its own members – the less the
government has to do.”
Listen in as Dr. Rebecca Oas discusses what America had to say about the vote
and why recognizing the traditional family unit is so important. Tune in to the
next segment to hear more!
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2 - Other Countries Get It.
Topic: Defending the Traditional Family at the UN
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Dr. Rebecca Oas continues to
discuss the recent UNHRC vote concerning the traditional family unit.
This
year’s resolution, which was strongly opposed by the US, stated: the family is
“the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and
particularly children.” While the State is responsible for protecting the human
rights of all, “the family has the primary responsibility for the nurturing and
protection of children.”
The family is not specifically defined in the resolution; that is still left up
to each country to decide on their own. So why do the US and other countries
still object to it? Listen in as Dr. Rebecca Oas discusses this issue further.
Click here for more on this and other pro-family issues.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
August 14, 2013
Title: Use of Euphemisms – Wordsmithing at its Deadliest
Topic: Menstrual Regulation
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Part 1 of 2
Pro-Choice. Family
Planning. Menstrual Regulation.
The baby killers have been masters with framing the argument through the use of
euphemisms. Their wordsmiths have been better than ours.
You might be surprised that the baby killers have used the term “menstrual
regulation” to include medical as well as surgical methods of abortion.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Menstrual Regulation
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Pro-Choice. Family
Planning. Menstrual Regulation. They all mean the same: Abortion
A researcher dedicated to bringing risky medical abortion to developing
countries has set her sights on Bangladesh. But Bangladesh outlaws abortions.
The baby killers are wanting to expand their reach through the use of pills.
They want the U.N. to classify the drugs as essential medicines. Pray this does
not happen. Let’s save more babies. Listen in.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
November 13, 2012
Title: Are Abortion Limits Equivalent To Forced Abortions?
Topic: Abortion
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
Part 1 of 2
Please share with us the story of Feng Jianmei from China.
Why are laws with restrict abortion being compared to China's brutal forced
abortion policy which traumatized Feng Jianmei?
What are some claims of the recent article put out by the Guttmacher Institute
(the research division of Planned Parenthood)?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Abortion
Discussed by Dr. Rebecca Oas
with Center for Family and Human Rights (www.C-Fam.org)
What are some of the United States laws that this article discussed and are
labeling as "coercion in reproductive decision making"?
Why is the Guttmacher article shedding such negative light on laws that provide
incentives for childbearing?
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization