Search Results

To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.

October 10, 2025

Title: ACTIVIST JUDGES CONTINUE TO RUN AMOK
Topic: Judges Gone Wild

Discussed by Michael O'Neill
with Landmark Legal Foundation (www.landmarklegal.org/)

Disclaimer: Please do not construe any statement made during this interview as legal advice. Always consult your attorney for advice on this and other legal issues.

Federal judges continue to inject policy and politics into their jobs, which is, of course, against the law.

Today, Michael O’Neill comments on the latest examples of judicial activism. Michael is the Vice President of Legal Affairs at the Landmark Legal Foundation.

Click here for more information about the Landmark Legal Foundation.

Questions/Issues Discussed:

Why was the individual who attempted to murder Justice Kavanaugh given such a lenient sentence? Michael first gives the details about the case before explaining the judges bizarre sentence.

When local law enforcement cannot – or will not – secure federal buildings and the safety of federal personnel, does US law allow the President leeway to send the National Guard?

Is there a distinction between National Guard Troops and Federal Troops?

Where is America headed if we do not alter our course?

Will ANTIFA and others protesting step down if ordered to do so by the US Supreme Court? Michael gives his personal opinion.

Click here to help support the Landmark Legal Foundation.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

October 11, 2016

Title: Dem’s Have Appointed over 70% Of Federal Judges
Topic: Judges Gone Wild

Discussed by Andy Schlafly
with Phyllis Schlafly Eagles (www.PhyllisSchlafly.com)

Is the Constitution a living, breathing document? Or, is it set in stone? Andy Schlafly, son of the great Phyllis Schlafly, will be discussing why it is so important for Christians to vote for moral, Biblical values this November 8 as it relates to all Judicial positions in America.

Questions/Issues Discussed:

What percent of the Federal Judiciary has now been appointed by liberal Democrat Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama?

Do the Federal Courts matter?

Are Democrat or Republican Judges more likely to legislate from the bench?

There seems to be two philosophies concerning our US Constitution. One is a strict interpretation; the other is that the Founding Fathers meant for a living, breathing, changing constitution. What’s the difference?

Listen in as Andy also gives a great prediction of what his mother is doing in heaven right now concerning this election!

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

March 7, 2012

Title: Since Ginsburg Likes Use of Foreign Law So Much, Can She Please LEAVE The USA?
Topic: Judges Gone Wild

Discussed by Phyllis Schlafly
with Eagle Forum (www.eagleforum.org)

Part 1 of 2

Special guest Phyllis Schlafly answers:

Does U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg really like our U.S. Constitution?

Did U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg swear an oath to uphold and defend our U.S. Constitution?

When Clinton nominated Ginsburg in 1993, how were her views already well known?

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

Title: Part 2 of 2
Topic: Judges Gone Wild

Discussed by Phyllis Schlafly
with Eagle Forum (www.eagleforum.org)

What was "Sex Bias in the U.S." about? How were Ginsburg and coauthor Brenda Feigan-Fasteau paid?

What are some of the extremist concepts from the Ginsburg book that could have made hilarious entertainment for television viewers of her confirmation hearings?

What is the whole point of Senate hearings? Can a nominee who toys with foreign law truthfully pass the test?

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization