Search Results
To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.
November 4, 2025
Title: SAME-SEX COURT RULING BY TEXAS SUPREME COURT
Topic: Same-Sex Unions
Discussed by Jonathan Saenz
with Texas Values (TxValues.org)
Do Judges in Texas have a judicial obligation to perform wedding ceremonies for homosexuals desiring marriage?
Today, Jonathan Saenz discusses a recent Texas Supreme Court ruling regarding this very issue. Jonathan Saenz is the President of
Texas Values, the largest statewide non-profit organization dedicated to standing for faith, family, and freedom in Texas.
Click
here
to read more on this issue from Texas Values.
Questions/Issues Discussed:
What is the “Texas Code of Judicial Conduct”?
After the US Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriages in 2015, why did many Judges in Texas stop performing wedding ceremonies?
Pro-Life/Pro-Family Christian leader, Diane Hensley, was a Justice of the Peace in McClennan County, Texas. She continued to perform wedding ceremonies after 2015, but only for heterosexual couples. Did Diane cause waves with this decision?
Jonathan Saenz discusses the case against her in 2019, which is still ongoing.
Did the Texas Supreme Court recently rule that judges in Texas will not be punished for standing for their faith?
Click
here
to help support Texas Values.
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 20, 2015
Title: Supreme Court is being Pushed on Marriage Issue
Topic: Same-Sex Unions
Discussed by Professor John Sparks
with Grove City College (www.gcc.edu)
Edmund Burke wrote
the following in Reflections on the Revolution in France: “When ancient
opinions and rules of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be
estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know
distinctly to what port we steer.”
The SCOTUS has agreed to hear four cases involving the issue of same-sex unions.
These cases come from the Sixth Circuit, where the U.S. Appeals Court had
earlier upheld Michigan’s definition of marriage as limited to one man and one
woman. That decision (DeBoer v. Snyder) created what is called a “conflict among
the Circuits” and forced the Supreme Court to address the issue – a decision
which will affect every American.
Dr. John Sparks, with the Center for Vision and Values at Grove City
College, is confident that SCOTUS will continue to allow individual states to
make their own laws regarding same-sex unions. But what about the “Full faith
and Credit Provision”? Dr. Sparks discusses how this law gives respect to the
legal determinations of other states, including same-sex unions. However, it has
some wiggle room. Listen in as he explains this Provision, how states have dealt
with various marriage issues in the past, and what the future of marriage may
look like.
Dr. Sparks’ article on this issue can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 17, 2015
Title: Supreme Court is being Pushed on Marriage Issue
Topic: Same-Sex Unions
Discussed by Professor John Sparks
with Grove City College (www.gcc.edu)
Edmund Burke wrote
the following in Reflections on the Revolution in France: “When ancient
opinions and rules of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be
estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know
distinctly to what port we steer.”
The SCOTUS has agreed to hear four cases involving the issue of same-sex unions.
These cases come from the Sixth Circuit, where the U.S. Appeals Court had
earlier upheld Michigan’s definition of marriage as limited to one man and one
woman. That decision (DeBoer v. Snyder) created what is called a “conflict among
the Circuits” and forced the Supreme Court to address the issue – a decision
which will affect every American.
Dr. John Sparks, with the Center for Vision and Values at Grove City
College, is confident that SCOTUS will continue to allow individual states to
make their own laws regarding same-sex unions. But what about the “Full faith
and Credit Provision”? Dr. Sparks discusses how this law gives respect to the
legal determinations of other states, including same-sex unions. However, it has
some wiggle room. Listen in as he explains this Provision, how states have dealt
with various marriage issues in the past, and what the future of marriage may
look like.
Dr. Sparks’ article on this issue can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization
March 12, 2015
Title: Supreme Court is being Pushed on Marriage Issue
Topic: Same-Sex Unions
Discussed by Professor John Sparks
with Grove City College (www.gcc.edu)
Edmund Burke wrote
the following in Reflections on the Revolution in France: “When ancient
opinions and rules of life are taken away, the loss cannot possibly be
estimated. From that moment we have no compass to govern us; nor can we know
distinctly to what port we steer.”
The SCOTUS has agreed to hear four cases involving the issue of same-sex unions.
These cases come from the Sixth Circuit, where the U.S. Appeals Court had
earlier upheld Michigan’s definition of marriage as limited to one man and one
woman. That decision (DeBoer v. Snyder) created what is called a “conflict among
the Circuits” and forced the Supreme Court to address the issue – a decision
which will affect every American.
Dr. John Sparks, with the Center for Vision and Values at Grove City
College, is confident that SCOTUS will continue to allow individual states to
make their own laws regarding same-sex unions. But what about the “Full faith
and Credit Provision”? Dr. Sparks discusses how this law gives respect to the
legal determinations of other states, including same-sex unions. However, it has
some wiggle room. Listen in as he explains this Provision, how states have dealt
with various marriage issues in the past, and what the future of marriage may
look like.
Dr. Sparks’ article on this issue can be found [here].
More from this Guest More on this Topic More from this Organization