Search Results

To Listen to Audio click the Play Button [beneath each segment] which varies based on the browser you are using.

July 11, 2011

Title: What is meant by the “Commerce Clause” and the “General Welfare Clause
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 1 of 3

While House Republicans clamor against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they push the nationalization of medical malpractice law. Professor Natelson discusses what is meant by the “Commerce Clause” that liberals and conservatives have used since the mid-1930’s to expand the Federal Governments power. If Republicans argue against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they should also argue against HR 5.

Learn more at www.i2i.org.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

Title: Applying the commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause and the Enumerated Powers of States to Obamacare
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 2 of 3

Since the mid-1930’s, liberals and conservatives have been expanding Federal powers by applying the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause found in the US Constitution. But are they applying these correctly? Waking up to the founder’s intent in the 10th Amendment, conservatives are beginning to argue against Obamacare. If Republicans argue against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they should also argue against HR 5. Listen in to learn why!

Log onto www.i2i.org for more information.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

Title: Believe Obamacare is Unconstitutional, Ask yourself: “Why Isn’t HR 5 Unconstitutional, Also?”
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 3 of 3

Twenty-plus states are using their Seventh Amendment Right to Sue and are exercising this right in their attempt to prove Obamacare is Unconstitutional. If the US Supreme Court rules Obamacare is Constitutional and that Congress can tell every American to buy health insurance, what’s next? If Republican’s nationalize medical malpractice law, what’s next? Listen in to learn why!

Log onto www.i2i.org for more information.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

July 8, 2011

Title: Will Nationalizing Medical Malpractice Law Be Unconstitutional?
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Dr. John Baker
with The Fund for American Studies (www.TFAS.org)

What compels House Republican leaders to ignore the Constitution? The explanation for the eagerness of House Republican leaders to nationalize even more of the economy is a simple reality: both Congressional Democrats and Congressional Republicans like the New Deal interpretation of the Commerce Clause, which allow them to expand national power. They would just do so for different purposes.

To justify their efforts to nationalize medical malpractice law, House Republicans are stretching the Supreme Court’s New Deal Commerce Clause jurisprudence almost as far as Democrats did for Obamacare. Both national medical malpractice reform and Obamacare are radically at odds with our constitutional structure of federalism.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

June 23, 2011

Title: What is meant by the “Commerce Clause” and the “General Welfare Clause
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 1 of 3

While House Republicans clamor against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they push the nationalization of medical malpractice law. Professor Natelson discusses what is meant by the “Commerce Clause” that liberals and conservatives have used since the mid-1930’s to expand the Federal Governments power. If Republicans argue against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they should also argue against HR 5. Learn more at www.i2i.org.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

Title: Applying the commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause and the Enumerated Powers of States to Obamacare
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 2 of 3

Since the mid-1930’s, liberals and conservatives have been expanding Federal powers by applying the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause found in the US Constitution. But are they applying these correctly? Waking up to the founder’s intent in the 10th Amendment, conservatives are beginning to argue against Obamacare. If Republicans argue against Obamacare as being unconstitutional, they should also argue against HR 5. Listen in to learn why! Log onto www.i2i.org  for more information.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization

Title: Believe Obamacare is Unconstitutional, Ask yourself: “Why Isn’t HR 5 Unconstitutional, Also?”
Topic: HR 5: Nationalization of Medical Malpractice Law

Discussed by Professor Robert Natelson
with Professor Robert Natelson (www.ArticleVInfocenter.com)

Part 3 of 3

Twenty-plus states are using their Seventh Amendment Right to Sue and are exercising this right in their attempt to prove Obamacare is Unconstitutional. If the US Supreme Court rules Obamacare is Constitutional and that Congress can tell every American to buy health insurance, what’s next? If Republican’s nationalize medical malpractice law, what’s next? Listen in to learn why! Log onto www.i2i.org for more information.

More from this Guest      More on this Topic      More from this Organization